$7M worth of fake Apple chargers seized by Texas Customs and Border Protection agentsNew Foto - $7M worth of fake Apple chargers seized by Texas Customs and Border Protection agents

U.S. Customs and Border Protection's agents in Texas seized over $7 million worth of counterfeit Apple chargers this week. Customs and Border Protection's Houston Seaport Trade Enforcement Team found the chargers or lightning cables, according to the announcement. Agents at the Area Port of Houston and Galveston found 373,000 counterfeit USB phone chargers, or 7,460 cartons containing the Apple trademark. Both border protection agents and Apple representatives confirmed that they were fake. Customs and Border Protection Acting Area Port Director John Landry said in the announcement that criminal networks have been using e-commerce to ship their items to "unsuspecting consumers and exploit the high volume of cargo processed by CBP." Landry, from Customs and Border Protection, said counterfeiters don't pay taxes and their actions have a negative impact on legitimate jobs. "The counterfeits are often produced under unsanitary labor exploitation conditions," he said. "They hurt innovation by stealing intellectual property from registered trademarks and the counterfeits are often produced under unsanitary labor exploitation conditions." According to the department, buying counterfeit goods supports criminal activities like forced labor or human trafficking. Most of these items have come from China and Hong Kong, the department said, adding that during fiscal year 2024, seizures from China and Hong Kong accounted for 90% of seized items. More news:More than 10,000 chicks were left in a USPS truck for days. Now they need a home. According to Customs and Border Protection, customers who want to protect themselves can do the following: Buy directly from the trademark holder or from authorized retailers. Know the market value of the items they are purchasing. If the items are priced much lower, they could be fake. Look for legitimate websites that offer customer service contact information and have return policies. The department said consumers should only buy from legitimate sources and pay attention to pricing. If it seems too good to be true, it probably is, the department said. Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia–the 757. Email her at sdmartin@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Fake Apple charges seized by Customs and Border Protection in Texas

$7M worth of fake Apple chargers seized by Texas Customs and Border Protection agents

$7M worth of fake Apple chargers seized by Texas Customs and Border Protection agents U.S. Customs and Border Protection's agents in Tex...
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block FOIA case against DOGENew Foto - Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block FOIA case against DOGE

TheTrump administrationhas asked the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency injunction to block proceedings in a case involving a Freedom of Information request seeking information from the Department of Government Efficiency. The government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington sued DOGE earlier this year for public access to its records and plans for overhauling the government. The administration has claimed executive privilege, insisting that DOGE -- as a presidential advisory board -- is not subject to FOIA. A federal court hearing the case is planning to proceed with depositions and document production as part of a hearing determine whether FOIA applies. Solicitor General John Sauer told the court that such an effort defeats the purpose of the litigation and effectively would expose private executive branch information. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates. Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block FOIA case against DOGEoriginally appeared onabcnews.go.com

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block FOIA case against DOGE

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to block FOIA case against DOGE TheTrump administrationhas asked the U.S. Supreme Court for an emerg...
'Don't know how we will survive': Medicaid cuts could put this group of mothers in perilNew Foto - 'Don't know how we will survive': Medicaid cuts could put this group of mothers in peril

WASHINGTON – Meghan Hullinger credits her life, and that of her now-7-year-old son, to Medicaid. The 42-year-old community engagement specialist for a nonprofit said she became close to septic while pregnant with her third child, and that without the government-funded health insurance program, she would not have been able to afford live-saving care. "That would have been an astronomical cost," Hullinger said of her emergency room visits, hospital stay and procedure. If not for Medicaid, "I'm almost positive I would have died." Now, Medicaid is on the chopping block. The health care program that insures more than 70 million low-income and disabled Americans has been caught in the crosshairs of negotiations, as Republicans in Congress hash out a major overhaul on government spending in order to implement PresidentDonald Trump'stax cuts and other legislative priorities. At least 7.7 million individuals could end up without coverage over the next decade under Republicans' current plan, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Among those most vulnerable to Medicaid reform, experts told USA TODAY, are women like Hullinger who are giving birth and raising children in rural areas, where maternal services are often already in short supply. And with many rural hospitals teetering on the knife's edge of financial stability, any loss of funds from decreased Medicaid spending could push some facilities towards closure and make care access more difficult for all patients, regardless of their provider. "It threatens the abilities of rural communities to grow and thrive," said Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University. Suffering from extreme nauseousness and urinating blood, Hullinger went to see her OBGYN, located a ninety-minute drive from her 1,000-person town of Marlinton, West Virginia. Later that week, still struggling to keep food down, she visited the emergency room and sat for a round of blood work. Twenty-four hours after that, Hullinger said her partner found her at home on the couch, pale and sweating, and he demanded she return to the ER. This time, she was sent by ambulance to a larger hospital three counties and three hours over in the state's capital city. Doctors at Charleston Area Medical Center diagnosed her with pancreatitis and said her gallbladder would need to be removed, following a week of IV fluids. What would have cost thousands – including her initial OBGYN appointment, the hospital stay and procedure – she said was all covered by Medicaid. As was the birth of her son, Nathan, four months later. Pocahontas County, where Hullinger lives, is "very, very rural," she said. "To put it in perspective, we have two stoplights in the entire county." The county of less than 8,000 people is alsoprimarily servedby one rural hospital with limited services. "It's already very difficult in the best of circumstances for moms to deliver babies, for pregnant moms to stay healthy," said Hullinger, a mother of four. Adding onto that any reductions in Medicaid, she said, would be "devastating." In U.S. cities, around 1 in 5 women between the ages of 19 and 44 rely on Medicaid for health insurance. In rural areas, that number can jump closer to 1 in 4, according to anew reportby Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. The program has been a "lifeline" for Victoria Fuller, 35, of Sierra Vista, Arizona. The mother of five said Medicaid covered her prenatal and post-partum visits, as well as the additional medical care needed when she was diagnosed with gestational diabetes in her third pregnancy. "For me personally, losing Medicaid during my third pregnancy would have meant going without the care I needed," Fuller said, "which could have led to serious complications for both me and my baby." Medicaid covers almost half of all births in rural America, compared to 40% of those in metropolitan areas, Georgetown University's report found. "Medicaid cuts would be especially devastating for rural communities," Alker of Georgetown said, "because they're already suffering from a sharp decline in the availability of obstetric services and labor and delivery services." In Iowa, where registered nurse Abby Butler lives, 62 out of the state's 77 rural counties do not have a practicing OBGYN, according toa studyby Common Sense Institute Iowa last August. "Those are already people who are lacking providers," Butler, 26, said. Plus, Butler said, "Rural hospitals really rely on Medicaid to function." Medicaid accounted for almost 20% of hospital spending across the board in 2023, according to the health policynonprofit KFF.  Meanwhile, about half of all rural hospitals are operating withnegative margins. Butler, currently in the second trimester of pregnancy with her second child, said the hospital where she works in Dubuque, Iowa, sees many patients brought in from neighboring rural care centers. The loss of Medicaid funds by any measure, she said, could devastate some facilities, forcing them to close and leaving entire areas stranded for care. "When you're pregnant, you have to go and see the doctor a lot," Butler said. "Towards the end, you're going there once a week. So imagine having to travel once a week an hour; a lot of people would just end up not going to see their doctor." "Or," she added, "if they had any issues, that long travel to a hospital ... they could lose the baby or they could die on their way." Mississippi state Rep. Timaka James-Jones worries now that shrinking Medicaid access could mean more stories like that of her niece, Harmony Ball-Stribling. The evening of July 4, 2021, Byron Stribling rushed to get his wife, pregnant with their first child, to the nearest hospital, about 30 miles away. Harmony and her unborn child, who the couple had named Harper, died before they could reach the hospital, four days before her scheduled due date. "We're not talking dollars and cents," James-Jones said. "At the end of the day, now we're talking about lives, and people are dying. People are truly dying because there is no health care in some places." Republican leaders in Congress are racing to finalize a massive spending package before the end of summer. In order to finance the ambitious overhaul, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, has promised to tighten the federal purse strings by trillions and directed various committees to come up with the difference. The House Energy and Commerce Committee was tasked with finding $880 billion in savings from programs under their purview. Since Trump expressly ruled out changes to Medicare, which provides health care coverage for the elderly, focus turned then to Medicaid. In a party-line vote on May 14 thatfollowed a marathon meeting, members of the GOP-led committee advanced several rollbacks to Medicaid coverage, including work requirements. People who are pregnant or receiving care post-partumare among those exemptfrom this employment requisite. The new provisions avoided some of the more drastic cuts lawmakers had proposed, such as lowering the federal match rates with states. Republicans in the Energy and Commerce Committee said the changes they did back are intended to cut waste and fraud in order to protect Medicaid for those who really need it. "Medicaid was created to provide health care for Americans who otherwise could not support themselves, but Democrats expanded the program far beyond this core mission," Chair Brett Guthrie, R-Kentucky, said during the committee's meeting that began on May 13. Democrats in Congress and across the country have pushed back, saying that cuts of any size could still have consequences for Americans seeking care. The same year that Harmony Ball-Stribling died, Mississippi had the highest maternal mortality rateof any state. The Magnolia State, where over half the population livesin rural communities, is one of 10 states that have yet to expand Medicaid. "The federal government is talking about cutting more − I just don't know how we will survive," James-Jones said. Contributing: Riley Beggin This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Medicaid cuts could put this group of mothers in peril

'Don't know how we will survive': Medicaid cuts could put this group of mothers in peril

'Don't know how we will survive': Medicaid cuts could put this group of mothers in peril WASHINGTON – Meghan Hullinger credits h...
House GOP works to push through bill advancing Trump's agenda -- as overnight hearing continuesNew Foto - House GOP works to push through bill advancing Trump's agenda -- as overnight hearing continues

House Republicans have worked through the night tomove a megabilladvancing President Donald Trump's legislative agenda through a key committee -- aiming to overcome division in the conference and advance the package to a House floor vote as soon as Wednesday. The House Rules Committee hearing is going strong after it started at 1 a.m. ET Wednesday with committee chairs and ranking members debating the details of the more than 1,000 page "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which has changes to Medicaid, state and local tax deductions, SNAP food assistance, immigration policy and more. The GOP is far from unified around the bill with several sticking points among Republican hard-liners primarily regarding Medicaid work requirements and a cap on state and local tax deductions. Trumpspoke to Republicans on Capitol Hill Tuesdayin an effort to persuade them to back his signature bill -- at one point threatening to primary those who vote against it. MORE: What's in Trump's 'big' tax and immigration bill House Republicans are struggling to pass Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, one of the holdouts, said there is "no way" the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passes in the House Wednesday -- despite Speaker Mike Johnson's goal of putting the bill on the floor as early as Wednesday after it clears the Rules Committee. Johnson is still working to secure the votes of the more than a dozen Republicans who are seeking additional changes to the legislation. Without changes, there is enough opposition to defeat it as Johnson can only afford to lose three votes. "We're further away from a deal," Harris said on Newsmax Wednesday morning. "This bill actually got worse overnight. There is no way it passes today." Key components of the legislation are set to come up in the Rules Committee Wednesday morning, which will focus on tax provisions, overhaul of SNAP and Medicaid cuts. However, GOP leaders have still not released expected changes -- negotiated by hard-liners and moderates -- to the tax and budget bill. Rules Committee Chair Rep. Virginia Foxx emphasized that Republicans need to move forward on their bill to "ensure our economic survival." She added that Republican changes to the package will be unveiled at some point during the hearing. Rep. Jim McGovern, the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, lambasted Republicans' reconciliation bill. "I've got a simple question. What the hell are Republicans so afraid of? What the hell are you so scared of that you guys are holding this hearing at 1 o'clock in the morning. It's a simple question that speaks to the heart of what's going on here, and one that I'm going to keep on asking, if Republicans are so proud of what is in this bill, then why are you trying to ram it through in the dead of night?" McGovern said. MORE: Trump urges House Republicans not to mess with Medicaid amid push to pass bill advancing his agenda: Sources On Wednesday morning, House Democratic leaders led by Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries pushed back on the bill by introducing an amendment -- one of the more than 500 amendments submitted by both Democrats and Republicans to the reconciliation package -- to strike all provisions that they say would "cause millions of Americans to lose healthcare and food assistance." "Unfortunately, we are here today discussing a bill that would make that American dream harder to reach for millions by increasing costs for families, hardworking American families, and gutting the things that they need to survive and thrive," Jeffries said, adding that the bill, if enacted, would force nearly 14 million people off health insurance. Jeffries said that if the bill passes, "hospitals will close, nursing homes will shut down, and people will die in all of your districts." He also attacked the potential overhaul to the federal food assistance program -- SNAP. Jeffries called the megabill "one, big ugly bill" that will "hurt the American people." Minority Whip Katherine Clark focused on the impacts the GOP's bill will have on health care for women like access to fertility treatments and screenings. "I hope this amendment gives you all pause when the women in this country deserve health care, and I hope you will think about the moms struggling to get by and stay healthy for the sake of their children and their families. It is not too late to do right by them," she said. Overnight, several Republican members left as Democrats burned the midnight oil -- introducing various amendments to the package. Ranking Member Bennie Thompson of Homeland Security expressed frustration with the process overnight. "I described Homeland Security portion of this bill as putting lipstick on a pig. I come from an agricultural district as well as a part of the country. So let me use another farming analogy to wrap up: We may be here in the dead of night, but you do not need the light of day to smell manure. The American people are not going to be fooled by any middle-of-the-night, manure-slinging here," the Mississippi Democrat said, adding that it "stinks to high heaven." Overnight, several committee chairs and ranking members testified before the powerful panel including Armed Services, Budget, Oversight, Natural Resources, Financial Services, Judiciary, Homeland Security, Transportation, Ways and Means, Energy and Commerce, Agriculture and Education. House GOP works to push through bill advancing Trump's agenda -- as overnight hearing continuesoriginally appeared onabcnews.go.com

House GOP works to push through bill advancing Trump's agenda -- as overnight hearing continues

House GOP works to push through bill advancing Trump's agenda -- as overnight hearing continues House Republicans have worked through th...
Justice Department moves to cancel police reform settlements reached with Minneapolis and LouisvilleNew Foto - Justice Department moves to cancel police reform settlements reached with Minneapolis and Louisville

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The Justice Department moved Wednesday to cancel a settlement with Minneapolis that called for an overhaul of its police department following the murder of George Floyd, as well as a similar agreement with Louisville, Kentucky, saying it doesn't want to pursue the cases. Following ascathing reportby the Justice Department in 2023, Minneapolis in Januaryapproved a consent decreewith the federal government in the final days of the Biden administration to overhaul its training and use-of-force policies under court supervision. The agreement required approval from a federal court in Minnesota. But the Trump administration was granted a delay soon after taking officewhile it considered its options,and on Wednesday told the court it does not intend to proceed. It planned to file a similar motion in federal court in Kentucky. "After an extensive review by current Department of Justice and Civil Rights Division leadership, the United States no longer believes that the proposed consent decree would be in the public interest," said the Minnesota motion, signed by Andrew Darlington, acting chief of the special litigation section of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. "The United States will no longer prosecute this matter." The Justice Department announced its decision just before the five-year anniversary of the murder of George Floyd. Then-officer Derek Chauvin used his knee on May 25, 2020, to pin the Black man to the pavement for 9 1/2 minutes in a case that sparked protests around the world and a national reckoning with racism and police brutality. However, no immediate changes are expected to affect the Minneapolis Police Department, which is operatingunder a similar consent decreewith theMinnesota Human Rights Department. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara reiterated at a news conference Tuesday that his department would abide by the terms of the federal agreement as it was signed, regardless of what the Trump administration decided. The city in 2023reached a settlement agreementwith the state Human Rights Department to remake policing, under court supervision, after the agency issued ablistering report in 2022that found that police had long engaged in a pattern of racial discrimination.

Justice Department moves to cancel police reform settlements reached with Minneapolis and Louisville

Justice Department moves to cancel police reform settlements reached with Minneapolis and Louisville MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The Justice Departme...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com