Sports

Here's a look at birthright citizenship, and how the world sees it, as Supreme Court case looms

The Supreme Court isonce againhearing arguments on whetherPresident Donald Trumpcandeny citizenshipto children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily.

Associated Press FILE - The Supreme Court is photographed, Feb. 6, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul, File) The image above shows the status of birthright citizenship across the world according to a Law Library of Congress 2018 report. (AP Digital Embed)

Supreme Court Religious Speech

The Wednesday case stems from an executive order Trump signed on the first day of his second term ending what's known as birthright citizenship, which guarantees citizenship to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil.

While the concept has been part of U.S. law for well over a century, it is relatively rare around the world.

What is birthright citizenship?

Birthright citizenship is based on the legal principle of jus soli, or "right of soil."

In the U.S., the right was enshrined in the Constitution after the Civil War, in part to ensure that former slaves would be citizens.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States," the 14th Amendment states.

In the late 1800s,birthright citizenship was legally expandedto the children of immigrants.

Wong Kim Ark, who was born in the U.S. to Chinese parents, sued after traveling overseas and being denied reentry into the U.S. The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the amendment gives citizenship to everyone born in the U.S., no matter their parents' legal status.

Today there are only a handful of birthright exceptions, such as for children born in the U.S. to foreign diplomats.

How is birthright citizenship seen around the world?

Only about three dozen countries, nearly all of them in the Americas, guarantee citizenship to children born on their territory.

Most countries follow the principle of jus sanguinis, or "right of blood," with a child's citizenship based on the citizenship of their parents, no matter where they are born.

Advertisement

None of the 27 member states of the European Union, for example, grant automatic, unconditional citizenship to children born on their territories to foreign citizens. The situation is similar across much of Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

Some countries take a mixed approach

Some countries use a combination of principles, such as parenthood, residency and ethnicity, to decide a child's citizenship.

Australia, for example, allowed birthright citizenship until 1986. But starting that August, children born there could only become citizens if at least one parent was an Australian citizen or a permanent resident.

Things shifted the other way in Germany, which changed its citizenship laws in 2024.

Until then, citizenship by birth required that at least one parent was German. Starting in 2024, though, children born in Germany to non-German parents are automatically granted German citizenship if one parent has been legally living in the country for more than five years with unlimited residency status.

Citizenship laws were liberalized because "studies have shown that the education prospects of children and teenagers with a migration background are better, the sooner they were granted German citizenship," the government wrote at the time.

What is the Trump administration's argument?

Supporters of birthright restrictions in the U.S. focus on a handful of words in the constitutional amendment: "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

That phrase, they argue, means the U.S. can deny citizenship to children born to women who are in the country illegally.

A series of judges have ruled against the administration and the order has been repeatedly put on hold bylowercourts.

Wednesday's case originated inNew Hampshire, where a U.S. district judge ruled the order "likely violates" both the Constitution and federal law.

AP reporter Kirsten Grieshaber contributed to this story from Berlin.

Here's a look at birthright citizenship, and how the world sees it, as Supreme Court case looms

The Supreme Court isonce againhearing arguments on whetherPresident Donald Trumpcandeny citizenshipto children born to pa...
As Putin takes Russia off the grid, there are growing signs of discontent

Russians might be getting fed up with the Kremlinmaking their lives harder and more isolatedin the name of security.

NBC Universal Russia Daily Life 2026 (Getty Images)

A rare call for protests over the weekend followed mounting signs of anger and ridicule aimed at authorities, with pro-Kremlin influencers and newspapers joining a growing wave of public frustration at the government's approach.

A majormobile internet blackout in Moscowand thethrottling of the popular messaging app Telegram, both justified by ambiguous security considerations, helped fuel the rare public criticism over this erosion of digital freedoms and connectivity. It comes against the backdrop of soaring prices and an ailing wartime economy, withlittle sign of major battlefield progress in Ukraine.

Memes on TikTok and Instagram ridiculed Russians resorting to paper maps and pagers in the absence of mobile internet, or walking around the capital with satellite antennas strapped to their laptops.

Others went beyond satire, calling on their compatriots to gather in protest over the weekend. While authorities did not approve any public rallies, at least 20 people were detained for protesting digital restrictions across Russia on Sunday, a rights group said.

President Vladimir Putin "really wants every Russian citizen to feel alone and rejected," information technology specialist Alexander Isavnin said.

"He wants them to keep their discontent inside and feel like they are the only ones not happy about what is going on," Isavnin, 49, told NBC News, explaining why he was among those who tried — and failed — to get approval for protests in the capital and the Moscow region.

"We basically live in a digital concentration camp," he said.

Engaging in any form of protest has become increasingly dangerous sincea crackdown on free speech was intensifiedfollowing the2022 invasion of Ukraine. Even before the war, mass gatherings had to be sanctioned by local authorities. Most are still denied on grounds likeCovidrestrictions, which don't seem to apply to government-approved events.

Still, the increasing limits on digital freedoms appear to have hit a nerve with many Russians, despite the Kremlin's long-standing drive for greater control of their lives.

With state television and media heavily censored, the internet is one of the last bastions of freedom and a source of independent information for millions, although many foreign sites have been banned since the war.

Activist and political strategist Dmitry Kisiev was among those calling for mass gatherings March 29, a symbolic reference to Article 29 of the Russian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of thought and speech.

The Kremlin dismisses reports about Russia sending drones to Iran as "lies".  (Alexander Nemenov / AFP via Getty Images)

Kisiev, 31, said local activists had submitted applications to hold rallies in 17 regions across Russia. They were all denied, he said, including some that were initially given the go-ahead. Despite that, the OVD-Info protest monitoring group said Tuesday that at least 25 people were arrested across Russia for protesting digital restrictions Sunday, 18 of them in Moscow. The group also reported detentions ahead of Sunday of people who tried to apply to hold a protest.

Protests could show those who don't agree with the restrictions "that there are other like-minded individuals," Kisiev said.

NBC News reached out to more than a dozen Russians to ask what they think about the calls for protests. Most did not respond, while some declined to speak, without providing a reason.

Earlier this year,some Russians saidthey feared the Kremlin was preparing the public for a "North Korea" model of the internet, heavily controlled and censored by the state. "I don't think the Russian public will accept this," Kisiev said, given how central the internet has become to the lives of millions in the country.

Advertisement

Russian authorities have said that mobile internet outages are necessary to stop attacks by Ukrainian drones, and that Telegram is turning into a breeding ground for terrorism.

These justifications are "absurd," Kisiev said, adding that the real motivation seems obvious. "The government is intentionally killing the internet so that users don't use foreign resources and get alternative information," he said.

'Bring back the internet'

Russian authorities have touted the merits of a life without the internet, arguing it's an opportunity for a "digital detox" and more face-to-face interaction.

A popular game show that aired on a Russian state TV channel as calls for protests grewearlier this monthfeatured a children's choir, with members dancing enthusiastically and singing about how they don't need the internet. "The monitor's blue screen won't ruin my dinner," they crooned.

But despite this effort from the Kremlin, there is a huge appetite from the public for a way to vent frustration about the mounting restrictions, said politician Boris Nadezhdin, who tried torun for president against Putin in 2024and whose campaign was overseen by Kisiev.

Nadezhdin said in a phone interview that he supported the protests and had personally applied with authorities in the capital and the wider Moscow region for gatherings of up to 10,000 people. All his requests were turned down citing Covid concerns, he said.

"The slogans are clear," he said. "Bring back the internet, bring back Telegram, we don't need your MAX," he said, referring to the so-called national messenger increasingly imposed on Russians by the Kremlin. Critics say the app could be used for mass surveillance.

Taxi driver Alexey Popov applied for a protest against internet censorship in his Siberian town of Yakutsk. It was originally sanctioned for Monday, but that permission was later withdrawn, Popov, 27, told NBC News. The refusal letter from the municipal authorities, viewed by NBC News, stated that Popov could not hold a rally on any date because of "considerable attention" to the event from "destructive individuals."

People protest internet restrictions in St Petersburg, Russia - 29 Mar 2026 (Andrei Bok / SOPA Images via Reuters)

Popov said he was under no illusion that the protests would persuade the Kremlin not to further crack down, but said he didn't want to give "silent approval" to what the government is doing. "We don't agree with what is going on and we want to express that," he said.

Popov said on a Telegram channel he runs that he was detained Saturday and then released Monday. He told NBC News he was detained for disobeying police, a charge he disputes.

'Wall of mistrust'

The indignation has also been expressed by those either aligned with the Kremlin or normally not politically involved.

The growing restrictions have come in parallel with outrage over the mass extermination of livestock in Siberia, which has wreaked havoc on local farmers, due to what authorities said was an infectious pasteurellosis outbreak.

A lack of communication by the government appears to be at the core of these complaints.

"The wall of mistrust and misunderstanding between the people and the government is growing," pro-Kremlin journalist Anastasia Kashevarova wrote in a post on Telegram last week, as she warned that public revolt was the "fastest way to destroy Russia."

Awell-known Kremlin loyalist unexpectedly turned against Putinearlier this month, then landed in a psychiatric hospital. Ilya Remeslo cited the Kremlin's "strangling of internet and media freedoms" as a sign the Russian leader had lost grip on reality.

Famous Russian blogger Victoria Bonya, known for fitness videos shared with nearly 13 million subscribers on Instagram, also complained about official communication on internet restrictions, as well as the livestock crisis and soaring prices affecting ordinary Russians. "Is the commander-in-chief, Vladimir Putin, aware of what is happening with the country or not?" she questioned in one of her videos earlier this month, in rare public criticism of the Russian leader.

And a pro-Kremlin newspaper recently came out with an unusually critical editorial. "The number of meaningless bans per capita is already off the charts. And again, no sensible explanations," Moskovsky Komsomolets said earlier this month. It questioned whether authorities "consider us to be small children, unwise enough to explain anything to us and trust us."

As Putin takes Russia off the grid, there are growing signs of discontent

Russians might be getting fed up with the Kremlinmaking their lives harder and more isolatedin the name of security. ...
TSA absences fall sharply after US airport security workers get paid

March 31 (Reuters) - The Transportation Security Administration said ‌absences among the ‌nation's 50,000 security officers fell ​sharply on Monday as workers got paid after working six weeks without ‌a paycheck.

Reuters

The ⁠Homeland Security Department said the absence ⁠rate fell to 8.6% after being as ​high as ​12.4% ​on Friday. The ‌highest absences reported Monday were at Atlanta Monday with 29% of workers out along with ‌around 20% at ​Houston's two ​aiports, ​Baltimore, New Orleans, ‌New York JFK and ​Philadephia.

Advertisement

Major ​airports that had suffered multi-hour lines said ​Monday ‌that operations had largely ​returned to normal.

(Reporting by ​David Shepardson)

TSA absences fall sharply after US airport security workers get paid

March 31 (Reuters) - The Transportation Security Administration said ‌absences among the ‌nation's 50,000 security of...
Pentagon declines to reaffirm NATO's collective defense, says up to Trump

By Phil Stewart

Reuters

WASHINGTON, March 31 (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined on Tuesday to reaffirm the U.S. commitment to NATO's collective defense, saying ‌that would be up to President Donald Trump after European allies ‌had failed to stand with the United States in the war against Iran.

The remarks by Hegseth at ​a Pentagon briefing were extraordinary, given that collective defense lies at the heart of the NATO alliance, which was formed in 1949 with the primary aim of countering the risk of Soviet attack on allied territory.

Any signal by the United States ‌that it might not be ⁠willing to defend NATO allies in the event of attack by Russia or another adversary could severely weaken the alliance even ⁠if Trump opts against withdrawing from it altogether, something that may require consent by Congress.

Experts have long warned that such remarks could also encourage Russia to test NATO members' ​readiness ​to enforce the alliance's Article 5, which ​states an armed attack against one ‌member state is an attack on all.

Advertisement

Asked by Reuters at a news briefing if the United States is still committed to NATO's collective defense, Hegseth said: "As far as NATO is concerned, that's a decision that will be left to the president. But I'll just say a lot has been laid bare."

Hegseth then appeared ‌to point to Trump's latest remarks on social ​media blasting France for failing to allow overflight ​of U.S. military resupply aircraft ​headed to Israel and criticizing Britain for failing to launch the ‌war against Iran alongside the U.S. ​and Israel.

Trump said on ​Friday the United States does not "have to be there for NATO."

"You don't have much of an alliance if you have countries that are not ​willing to stand with ‌you when you need them. He's simply pointing that out, and ultimately, ​it'll be his decision of what that looks like," Hegseth said.

(Reporting ​by Phil Stewart; Editing by Alistair Bell)

Pentagon declines to reaffirm NATO's collective defense, says up to Trump

By Phil Stewart WASHINGTON, March 31 (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined on Tuesday to reaffir...
China, Pakistan call for start of peace talks as soon as possible, state media reports

March 31 (Reuters) - Chinese and Pakistani foreign ministers on ‌Monday called for an ‌immediate ceasefire and an end ​to war in the Gulf and Middle East regions, urging peace talks to be ‌held as ⁠soon as possible, Pakistan's foreign ministry and ⁠China's state news agency Xinhua reported.

Reuters

The diplomats also ​said the ​safety of ​waterways should ‌be ensured and that of ships and crews stranded in the waters within the Strait of Hormuz, Xinhua ‌said.

Advertisement

The countries made ​the appeal in ​a ​five-point initiative released on ‌Tuesday for restoring ​peace and ​stability in the region, Pakistan's foreign ministry said.

(Reporting ​by ‌Shi Bu, Xiuhao Chen and ​Ryan Woo, Ariba Shahid, ​Sakshi Dayal)

China, Pakistan call for start of peace talks as soon as possible, state media reports

March 31 (Reuters) - Chinese and Pakistani foreign ministers on ‌Monday called for an ‌immediate ceasefire and an end ​to...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com