DOJ to use False Claims Act to crack down on diversity initiatives at collegesNew Foto - DOJ to use False Claims Act to crack down on diversity initiatives at colleges

American universities are facing another threat from the Trump administration, which intends to use a civil anti-fraud law to withdraw federal funding from colleges that promote diversity and inclusion policies,the Department of Justice announcedMonday. The False Claims Act will be enforced "when a federal contractor or recipient of federal funds knowingly violates civil rights laws," Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche says in amemo. Such violations could include allowing antisemitism on campus or lettingtransgender women compete in sportsor use restrooms corresponding with their gender identity, Blanche writes in the two-page memo. Institutions also cannot employ DEI programs "that assign benefits or burdens on race, ethnicity, or national origin," he writes. The Department of Justice will broadly seek fines and damages in cases where violations are found and also will consider criminal enforcement for certain breaches, the memo said. The False Claims Act dates to the Civil War and allows the government to recover funds up to three times the damages it incurs, in addition to penalties,according to the DOJ. The law also allows private citizens to file suit claiming the government was defrauded and to keep a portion of any money the federal government recovers, the memo notes, adding: "The Department strongly encourages these lawsuits." The Justice Department's announcement is part of President Donald Trump's broader fusillade against diversity initiatives, with the Education Departmentadvising60 colleges they are under investigation for potential "antisemitic harassment and discrimination." The White House also iswithholding billions of dollars in critical education funds, some now under courtchallenge. Slamming the brakes on diversity efforts is giving whiplash to institutions still trying to figure out what the federal government will allow, an attorney who advises colleges told CNN. The Trump administration hasdecriedas "illegal and immoral discrimination" DEI practices designed toadvance racial, gender, class and other representationin public spaces. "It just ends up being a kind of 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' proposition," saidJodie Ferise, a higher education attorney and former faculty member at the University of Indianapolis. Universities that promoted their campus diversity to prospective students and faculty as a recruitment tool – often maintaining public "dashboards" with demographic information – now are being advised to deemphasize those efforts. "There's no way I would advise a client to maintain a dashboard like that now, and that makes me sad," Ferise said. "Those dashboards were in themselves a hiring tool: What that shows a diverse candidate is this is a place that maybe really wants me, a place where I could thrive." Attorney General Pamela Bondi backed the initiative unveiled Monday, warning universities that promote DEI policies are "putting their access to federal funds at risk," according to astatement. But while dozens of schools across the country have already appeased the administration – some abruptly ending DEI initiatives, laying off university staff and banning the use of words like "equality" and "gender" – such efforts haven't always spared them from mass funding cuts. In an effort to restore its more than $2 billion in blocked federal money, Harvard University in late April renamed its diversity, equity and inclusion office as theOffice of Community and Campus Life. The Ivy League school in Massachusetts also said it wouldn't host or fund affinity group celebrations during commencement amid Education Department threats to cut more money if it did not cancel graduation celebrations that could separate students by race. Even after those steps, the Trump administrationannouncedanother $450 million infederal funding cuts. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission also has launched an investigation into Harvard, the Wall Street Journalreported, with a Republican commissioner saying the university's efforts to diversify its faculty and scholarships designated for "underrepresented minorities" may be illegal discrimination. A spokesperson for the commission told CNN the law prohibited them from publicly confirming any investigation. A Harvard spokesperson did not answer questions about the reported investigation and referred CNN to published comments from President Alan Garber saying, "We do not have quotas, whether based on race or ethnicity or any other characteristic." In a letter to Harvard last week, the Justice Department said the Trump administration was investigating whether the school's admissions process had been used to defraud the government by not complying with a Supreme Court ruling that ended affirmative action, according toThe New York Times. The letter, which was reviewed by the Times, stated the investigation was launched under the False Claims Act. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

DOJ to use False Claims Act to crack down on diversity initiatives at colleges

DOJ to use False Claims Act to crack down on diversity initiatives at colleges American universities are facing another threat from the Trum...
Dallman pushes back on UW funding narrativeNew Foto - Dallman pushes back on UW funding narrative

(The Center Square) – At least one Wisconsin Republican says the University of Wisconsin isn't telling the whole story when it comes to what the state pays. UW President Jay Rothman last week announced the UW System slipped once again in the national ranking on state funding. "Wisconsin is now 44th out of 50 states in public funding of four-year universities – a drop of one spot – according to the latest national study of higher education funding," the university said. "Wisconsin is renowned for its affordable and accessible public universities. Yet we can't languish at the bottom anymore without seriously jeopardizing Wisconsin's economic vibrancy," Rothman added. He is asing state lawmakers for $856 million in the next state budget. Rep. Alex Dallman, R-Markesan, however said taxpayers need to know the truth about the UW's funding. "President Rothman and many others have boasted about how the 13 universities across Wisconsin are the best in the country and world, yet are quick to say that the taxpayers aren't funding higher education enough.," Dallman said. "The UW System is more worried about their national ranking than taking accountability for their lack of transparency here in Wisconsin." The University of Wisconsin's total budget in the current state spending plan is just under $14 billion for the two years of the state budget. And spending between the 2023-2024 school year, and the 2024-2025 school year grew by almost 6%. State funding is the smallest of the major pieces of university funding,at 18%, or about $2.5 billion. Federal funds make-up about 24% of the UW's budget, with a lot of that going toward research. Tuition is the largest single source of funding for the UW. The school says 58% of its money comes from students. Dallman those are just rough numbers. He said the UW doesn't provide specifics. "When I asked the UW System exactly how taxpayer dollars are distributed to each campus, their answer was not surprising. They don't have any specifics, just that 'the process is complex' and is based on a 'base plus' model," Dallman added. "This means that millions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars are determined by what UW System feels each campus deserves, not using any standard metric or formula." Dallman also said there are unanswered questions about what the UW is spending money on. "The UW System continues to invest millions of dollars in DEI and administrative bloat across our campuses. This is a complete waste of critical funding that should be going directly into our classrooms and labs," he said. "I know my constituents and many other taxpayers across the state are deeply concerned about the UW System's lack of transparency and accountability. It's time for the UW System to get serious."

Dallman pushes back on UW funding narrative

Dallman pushes back on UW funding narrative (The Center Square) – At least one Wisconsin Republican says the University of Wisconsin isn...
'Original Sin' book describes how Biden's inner circle limited work hours and access of aidesNew Foto - 'Original Sin' book describes how Biden's inner circle limited work hours and access of aides

WASHINGTON −Former President Joe Biden's Cabinet members described how access to the oldest person to ever serve in the office "dropped off considerably in 2024," according to a new book about the president's decline during his final year in office. "I don't think he has dementia," one Cabinet secretary said, according to the book "Original Sin" by Jake Tapper of CNN and Alex Thompson of Axios. "But the thing is, he's an old man. The president can give you four to six good hours a day. When he got tired, sloppy isn't the right word, but his guard was down." Another Cabinet secretary said instead of briefing Biden, the secretary would brief senior White House aides who passed along word to the the president. "Access dropped off considerably in 2024, and I didn't interact with him as much," the Cabinet secretary said. The book released May 20 revealed a trove of revelations about how Biden's inner circle of White House aides limited the hours of the day that he worked, the length of speeches he gave and even the access members of his Cabinet had with him. The release came a few days after the revelation that Biden, 82, has beendiagnosed with an aggressive formof prostate cancer, one that has metastasized to the bone. The book doesn't mention cancer. The ailment spurred widespread sympathy for the oldest person to ever serve as president. But it has also reinforced questions about his initial decision to run for reelection despite signs of physical frailty and the reality of advanced age. "Why didn't the American people have a better sense of his health picture?" Vice PresidentJD Vanceasked reporters May 19 as he returned from Rome. "Why didn't the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with? This is serious stuff." The book also comes days after apartial release of the recording of Biden's interviewwithspecial counsel Robert Hur,who investigated why classified documents were found at his home and private office. The Justice Department had released a transcript of the interview a year ago, but Republicans have pressed for the release of the audio recording for a better understanding of Biden's mental ability at the time. Hur decided not to prosecute Biden because jurors would have viewed him as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." At some times on the recordingreleased by Axios on May 16, Biden speaks almost at a whisper and has long pauses between words as he answers questions. He struggles to recall key dates, such as the year when his eldest son Beau Biden died. A ticking clock in the background emphasized the time Biden spent answering. Biden and his wife Jill rebuffed criticism that he waited too long to drop out of the 2024 campaign through public appearances before the book's release. Biden waspeppered with several questions on ABC's "The View"about his decision-making in the final months of his term, his relationship with major party leaders and if he takes responsibility for Trump's decisive victory in November. "I do, because look, I was in charge and he won," Biden said of 2020. "So I take responsibility." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Biden book 'Original Sin' reveals frailties as oldest serving president

'Original Sin' book describes how Biden's inner circle limited work hours and access of aides

'Original Sin' book describes how Biden's inner circle limited work hours and access of aides WASHINGTON −Former President Joe B...
Berating the BusinessesNew Foto - Berating the Businesses

You simply must berate businesses for acting rationally in response to tariffs:Walmart told investors it will probably have to raise prices soon in response to 10 percent across-the-board tariffs and 30 percent tariffs on Chinese imports. "Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,"wrotePresident Donald Trump on Truth Social. "Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I'll be watching, and so will your customers!!!" Or else what? Trump is acting like he can strong-arm Walmart's executives into behaving in a certain manner (and maybe he can!), but it's not crazy for a CEO to warn shareholders and other relevant stakeholders that prices will have to reflect altered trade conditions. Earlier in the month, the toy maker Mattelsaid something similar: It predicted a less-successful earnings outlook, that it would reduce the number of goods that are produced in Chinese factories, and that it was likely to raise prices. And Amazon made headlines in April when rumors started that the company would display the new, adjusted-for-tariffs prices alongside the old prices, which led to TrumpcallingAmazon CEO Jeff Bezos and the company quickly getting its PR folks to recant (after the White House press secretary started alleging Amazon was sympathetic to the Chinese Communist Party). These companies are all perfectly within their rights to make evident to customers what additional costs they're bearing due to the new tariff regime. But Trump—ostensibly a pro-business Republican—is also wrong to say that a company's profits are so large that they can simply "eat" the tariffs; it's a common leftist line to act like you know what kind of financial pain a big corporation can bear. Is he saying Walmart's shareholders should just accept worse performance for the good of the country? Why, exactly, should they do that? What incentive do they have? Is being a Walmart shareholder an altruistic pursuit? Walmart does a lot to keep prices low, it's part of its whole proposition to customers; it has an incentive to do that because it has built its brand around an Everyday Low Prices (EDLP) promise, where customers don't have to wait for sale events. It negotiates favorable deals with its manufacturers and does a lot of bulk purchasing, leveraging its size; it cuts out middlemen; it has really efficient inventory management and distribution networks; it tries to keep labor costs low (and has historically been very anti-union). But the flip side of all of these tactics is that, all across the country, it provides poor and middle-income Americans with the ability to get cheap groceries, clothing, cookware, lightbulbs, paper towels, laundry detergent—the stuff that keeps households running. All the handsomely paid executives are the ones who have an incentive to problem solve and strategize about how to keep these goods supplied and these prices low so that Americans in Middletown, Ohio, can manage to keep their homes afloat. But to Trump, that doesn't seem to matter: He just wants to convince people that, actually, it's foreign nations who will bear the costs of the tariffs, not American consumers or businesses. Honestly, threatening businesses like this—and implying that they'll be punished if they set prices at a different level than the government wants—feels a little communist to me. What a fascinating pivot for the GOP. Scenes from New York:"A Mexican naval ship in the East River accelerated suddenly in the wrong direction before slamming its masts into the Brooklyn Bridge in a crash that killed two crew members, federal transportation officials said on Monday,"reportsThe New York Times. "The ship, the Cuauhtémoc, was moving at a speed of about 2.3 knots after shoving off from a Lower Manhattan pier Saturday night with a tugboat's help, Brian Young of the National Transportation Safety Board said at a news conference.The 300-foot-long ship, which had 277 people on board, maintained that pace for 'a bit of time' before 'the speed began to increase,' said Mr. Young, the investigator leading the safety board's inquiry into the crash. The Cuauhtémoc's speed had risen to six knots when it hit the bridge less than five minutes after leaving shore, he said." It's not clearwhyit accelerated like that, and the full investigation could take a very long time—up to two years—to complete. Incredible exchange between aCNN reporter and comedian Tim Dillon, in which Dillon properly describes the power of establishment institutions and chafes at the concept that he and Theo Von and Joe Rogan have anywhere near that amount of power: CNN asks Tim Dillon if comedians with podcasts are "part of a new establishment" and gets immediately destroyed ????pic.twitter.com/oh3W1nI5Oc — Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd)May 19, 2025 "The US Department of Justice said it will investigate whether Chicago is discriminating against municipal job candidates by race after Mayor Brandon Johnson highlighted the number of Black officials in his administration while addressing a church on the city's south side,"reportsBloomberg."The investigation is 'based on information suggesting that you have made hiring decisions solely on the basis of race,' [Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division Harmeet] Dhillon, who was nominated by President Donald Trump, said in theletter." Will Pope Leo XIV have todeal with the IRS? Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase was breached by "criminals bribing employees and contractors in India to obtain client data,"perBloomberg.The Justice Department has opened a probe into the matter. Interestingly, "the perpetrators deployed what's called social engineering attacks—where criminals use people to gain unauthorized access to data, rather than exploiting flaws in computer code." Intelligentsia train fetishism continues, alas: Banger headline.pic.twitter.com/6ybwa5ql17 — JR Urbane Network (@JRUrbaneNetwork)May 18, 2025 The postBerating the Businessesappeared first onReason.com.

Berating the Businesses

Berating the Businesses You simply must berate businesses for acting rationally in response to tariffs:Walmart told investors it will probab...
'War Against Pro-Lifers': Inside Suspected Manifesto Of IVF Clinic BomberNew Foto - 'War Against Pro-Lifers': Inside Suspected Manifesto Of IVF Clinic Bomber

The suspected bomber of a California fertility clinic appears to have declared "war against pro-lifers" in a smattering of online writings believed to be his. Awebpagewith statements expressing hatred of religion and human life is part of an FBI probe into Guy Edward Bartkus, who allegedly killed himself in a bombing at American Reproductive Centers on Saturday, the FBI told the Daily Caller News Foundation. The suspected manifesto webpage cites an "anti-fascist" group, Sandy Hook Elementary School killer Adam Lanza and others as inspiration for the Pallm Springs attack, whichkilled Bartkusand injured 19 others. The webpage is one of "multiple" online materials the agency is reviewing to determine possible connections to Bartkus, FBI Los Angeles spokesperson Laura Eimiller told the DCNF. The FBI previouslysaidthat Bartkus left behind "anti-pro-life" writings and a "possible manifesto" and attempted to livestream the attack, all of which aligns with the contents of the webpage. The agency alsosaidBartkus "had nihilistic ideations" and deliberately targeted American Reproductive Centers, a facility providing in vitro fertilization (IVF) services. Multiplemediaoutletsreported that the alleged manifesto webpage was part of the investigation of the clinic attack, citing law enforcement sources. The website also mentions the author's sadness stemming from the recent death of a female friend, which matches law enforcement information about Bartkus' personal life, The Los Angeles Timesreported. "Life can only continue as long as people hold the delusional belief that it is not a zero sum game causing senseless torture, and messes it can never, or only partially, clean up," the alleged online manifesto states. "I think we need a war against pro-lifers." "It is clear at this point that these people aren't only stupid, they simply do not care about the harm they are perpetuating by being willing agents for a DNA molecule," it says. Text appearing on the tab for the page reads, "Fuck you pro-lifers!" The webpage also instructs viewers to "download the recorded stream of my suicide & bombing of an IVF clinic!"(RELATED: DOJ Wins Guilty Plea For One Of Few Pregnancy Center Attackers It Caught While Pro-Lifers Sit In Prison) The FBI identified twenty-five-year-old Guy Edward Bartkus as the suspect in the Saturday bombing of a Palm Springs, California fertility clinic. (Photo courtesy of the FBI) American Reproductive Centerssaid on Sundaythat no eggs or embryos were harmed in the explosion. A "services"webpagefor the clinic does not mention abortions. American Reproductive Centers did not respond to a request for comment. Bartkus' suspected manifesto gave links to other online materials labeled as "good stuff," including adocumentfrom "the Aponist Society," a fringegroupespousing "antinatalist" views along with "anarchism" and "anti-fascist" ideology. Antinatalism is the belief that humans should stop procreating. The Aponist Society condemned Bartkus' "act of terrorism" against the Palm Springs clinic in astatementabout Bartkus allegedly referencing the group. The "good stuff" section of the webpage also listed "antinatalism"materiallinked to the Sandy Hook shooter, whokilledmore than 20 people in his 2012 massacre. The alleged Bartkus manifesto also said "religion is retarded" and that the biblical idea of God is "evil." The webpage mentions the suicide of a "best friend" named "Sophie" in a section describing what brought the author "over the edge." The FBI has referred to Bartkus' alleged attack as "an intentional act of terrorism." "The Trump administration understands that women and mothers are the heartbeat of America," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a SaturdayX postwhen news broke of the Palm Springs bombing. "Violence against a fertility clinic is unforgivable." All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter's byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘War Against Pro-Lifers’: Inside Suspected Manifesto Of IVF Clinic Bomber

'War Against Pro-Lifers': Inside Suspected Manifesto Of IVF Clinic Bomber The suspected bomber of a California fertility clinic appe...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com