New US ambassador to Mexico formally arrives at time of busy binational agendaNew Foto - New US ambassador to Mexico formally arrives at time of busy binational agenda

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Aformer U.S. Army and CIA officerformally presented his credentials to Mexico's president Monday as the new United States ambassador to that country at a moment of increased U.S. pressure to fight the drug cartels and delicate trade negotiations. Amb. Ron Johnson, who served as ambassador to El Salvador during the first administration of U.S.President Donald Trump, met withPresident Claudia Sheinbaumat the National Palace along with his wife Alina Johnson. He left without making comments to the press. A U.S. special forces veteran, Johnson formed a close bond with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele, frequently appearing in the president's social media feed celebrating occasions outside of government functions. Johnson had been a U.S. military adviser in El Salvador during that country's civil war in the 1980s and pursued war criminals in the Balkans in the 1990s. His arrival in Mexico comes in the first year of Sheinbaum's presidency. She has shown greater willingness to take a harder stance against the country's powerful drug cartelsthan her predecessorand an ability to manage the sometimes erratic diplomacy of the Trump administration. Trump designatedseveral Mexican cartels foreign terrorist organizationsthis year and U.S. prosecutorsannounced the first terrorism-related chargesagainst people accused of working with the cartels last week. He has also announced and thensuspended most tariffs on imports from Mexico. Immigration has been at the top of Trump's agenda, but the flow of migrants across the U.S. border that had already been falling in the final months of the Biden administration has slowed to a comparative trickle. Sheinbaum also recently announced thatMexico would increase the amount of water it sends to the Rio Grandein an attempt to make up a water debt to Texas farmers. The deadlywreck of a Mexican Navy tall shipwith the Brooklyn Bridge Saturday adds one more binational issue to the relationship. Two sailors died and the incident is under investigation. ____ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean athttps://apnews.com/hub/latin-america

New US ambassador to Mexico formally arrives at time of busy binational agenda

New US ambassador to Mexico formally arrives at time of busy binational agenda MEXICO CITY (AP) — Aformer U.S. Army and CIA officerformally ...
Senate confirms Charles Kushner, Jared's dad, as ambassador to FranceNew Foto - Senate confirms Charles Kushner, Jared's dad, as ambassador to France

WASHINGTON - The Senate on Monday confirmed Charles Kushner, the father ofPresident Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, to serve asU.S. Ambassador to Franceand Monaco. Charles Kushner, 71, was confirmed by a vote of 51-45. Kushner is the founder of Kushner Companies, a New York-based real estate company. Hewas convicted of preparing falsetax returns, retaliating against a cooperating witness, and making false statements to the Federal Election Commission in 2005. He admitted to hiring a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law and having the sexual encounter videotaped. He then mailed the tape to his sister in an effort to intimidate her against becoming a witness in the federal investigation. Republican Chris Christie, then U.S. attorney for New Jersey, said Charles Kushner's actions were "one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes" he ever prosecuted. Charles Kushner served more than 16 months of a two-year sentence in federal prison and a halfway program before he was released in 2006,NorthJersey.com reported.Trumppardoned Charles Kushner in 2020,saying at the time that Kushner was devoted to philanthropic organizations and causes. "This record of reform and charity overshadows Mr. Kushner's conviction and 2 year sentence for preparing false tax returns, witness retaliation, and making false statements to the FEC," Trump's office said at the time. In October 2024, Forbesestimated thatKushner Companies was worth $2.9 billion and the Kushner family's net worth was $7.1 billion. Testifyingbefore the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in May,Charles Kushner acknowledged that he "made a very, very, very serious mistake" and "paid a very heavy price for that." "I think that my past mistakes actually make me better with my judgment, better in my view of life, better in my values to really make me more qualified to do this job," he added. Tennessee Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty said in the hearing that, "Charlie understands the unique and enduring bond between the United States and France—a bond rooted in shared history, democratic values, and mutual interests." "He is committed to advancing U.S. national security interests by deepening the U.S.-France alliance through pragmatic defense collaboration and fair, reciprocal trade relations," he added. Charles Kushner's son, Jared Kushner, has been married to Ivanka Trump since 2009. Jared Kushnerserved as a senior advisorfor Trump during his first term and was a key negotiator of the Abraham Accords, which establishnormalized diplomatic relationshipsbetween Israel and Morocco, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Sudan. USA TODAY Network archives were used in the reporting of this story.Contributing: Kathryn Palmer, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Senate confirms Charles Kushner as US ambassador to France and Monaco

Senate confirms Charles Kushner, Jared's dad, as ambassador to France

Senate confirms Charles Kushner, Jared's dad, as ambassador to France WASHINGTON - The Senate on Monday confirmed Charles Kushner, the f...
FBI leaders under pressure from MAGA voters to act on their corruption claimsNew Foto - FBI leaders under pressure from MAGA voters to act on their corruption claims

For years, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino have said the Biden administration and corrupt "deep state" actors "weaponized" the FBI against Donald Trump. They accused the bureau of covering up what it knew about pipe bombs placed before the Jan. 6 attack. They suggested that FBI operatives helped ignite the Capitol riot. They said FBI agents committed crimes and tried to "overthrow" Trump. When Patel and Bongino did that, they weren't just saying they disagreed with FBI investigative or prosecution decisions. They were accusing people of federal crimes. It would be illegal to investigate and prosecute someone because you didn't like their political beliefs, which is what they are saying happened. And there is no evidence to support that. Now that the two men lead the FBI, Director Patel and Deputy Director Bongino find themselves in an awkward position. Large numbers of Trump supporters still believe all those things, and some are publicly asking: Why haven't Bongino and Patel exposed the "truth" about the "deep state" they promised? Why isn't the Trump administration arresting and prosecuting the people Patel labeled "government gangsters"? Since they took office, the two men have apparently sought to walk a careful line. They are backtracking on — or have stopped talking about — some of their debunked claims while promising to release documents they say will shed new light on others, including their assertions of FBI wrongdoing in the Russia and Jan. 6 investigations. Their approach has alienated a segment of MAGA voters. "Soup salad from Kash and Dan," MAGA podcaster Joe Oltmannsaid Monday on X, referring to an interview the pair did that aired over the weekend on Fox Business. "WTH is happening and why does it feel same same is happening as say, Comey in the position?" Current and former FBI officials say what Patel and Bongino are experiencing is the difference between playing the role of a partisan conspiracy theorist and running a law enforcement agency with 38,000 employees. The FBI declined to comment. "Once they got to the FBI, I'm sure they found that it wasn't full of deep state operators looking to undermine our democracy," said Christopher O'Leary, a former senior FBI agent. "Quite the opposite — the FBI ranks are full of dedicated agents and intelligence professionals who are committed to the rule of law and protecting the Constitution. Which, unfortunately for them, is inconsistent with many of the conspiracies and disinformation that they were perpetuating in their prior lives." The awkwardness was on display in theFox Business interview, conducted by Maria Bartiromo, who over the years has joined Patel and Bongino in saying the FBIhad been weaponized. Bartiromo grilled Patel, for example, about why former FBI officials who supervised the investigation into the Trump campaign's dealings with Russia haven't been prosecuted for their alleged misdeeds. "Come on, Director, with all due respect, we've been talking about this for a long time, and I've been demanding accountability for many, many years," Bartiromo said. "Comey, Strzok and the rest, they've got TV shows, they've got media platforms. They're fine. There's been no accountability." She was referring to former FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired in 2017, and former FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was fired from the FBI in 2018 after texts showing his deep political and personal animus to Trump surfaced. Both men played roles in the Russia investigation. Patel responded that the statute of limitations had passed. "Well, look, it's a fair criticism, but what I will tell people is we weren't here in the FBI in the last five years when we had statute of limitations that were still in play where we could have investigated criminal conduct. "What we can do now is continue to put out the documents and the information that these people withheld from the American public," he added. "He and I just found out more last week, and we're continuing to work with Congress to put those documents out." In fact, John Durham, a special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration, spent three years investigating the claims of criminality by Comey, Strzok and other senior FBI officials but never charged them with crimes. Durham indicted a rank-and-file FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an email on a surveillance warrant application. Two other people accused of lying to the FBI were acquitted at trial. Promises to release FBI documents appear to be part of Patel and Bongino's strategy to appease MAGA conspiracy theorists while supervising thousands of FBI agents who believe the conspiracy theories are false and destructive. Patel said in the Fox Business interview that his predecessors at the FBI "withheld and hid documentation and put it in rooms where people weren't supposed to look, and it's a good thing we're here now to clean it up, and you're about to see a wave of transparency. Just give us about a week or two." Patel has also promised to release a trove of files related to the FBI's Jan. 6 investigation. Bongino and Patel both have hinted that they believe the FBI played a role in encouraging the rioters. Patel was an early proponent of the "fed-surrection" conspiracy theory that undercover FBI agents instigated the Capitol riot to smear the MAGA movement. "When did the FBI put those guys in, and where?" Patel asked on a2022 episode of his online show, "Kash's Corner.""And did those confidential human sources engage people who are not going to conduct criminal activity and convince them to do so?" But now Bongino appears to be adopting a more nuanced view. "We dug far and wide to find it, and I'm pretty sure now we have a conclusive, definitive answer," Bongino said, promising a release of new documents. But, he added, he wanted to make sure the public understands that "there's a difference between agents and assets. And I just hope when people put that information out there, they make the distinction." He appeared to be referring to anexhaustive Justice Department inspector general's reportpublished in December that concluded no undercover FBI employees were at the Jan. 6 riot. The report found that 26 "confidential human sources" were in Washington to be part of the protests but that none were authorized to enter the Capitol. Four did so anyway, the report found. Bongino's emphasis on the difference between "agents" and "assets" suggested that the information the FBI is releasing is consistent with the inspector general's findings. Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have also promised to release more new files about the disgraced financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The existence of an Epstein client list that will expose Democratic politicians remains widely believed in pro-Trump circles. But officials close to the investigation say no such client list exists. Patel and Bondi haven't said one does, but they have promised new files that will provide new details. Some in MAGA world are getting restless. "Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are protecting pedophiles identities at this point," Trump supporter Evan Kilgoresaid on X, where he has more than 115,000 followers. In the Fox Business interview, Patel and Bongino were unequivocal in asserting that the evidence they have seen shows that Epstein did kill himself in jail in 2019, despite widespread doubts about that official story. "You said Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide," Bartiromo said. "People don't believe it." Patel said: "They have a right to their opinion. But as someone who has worked as a public defender, as a prosecutor, who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was." Bongino added: "I've seen the whole file. He killed himself." A MAGA supporter responded bycalling Bonginoa "Deep State traitor" on Truth Social. Patel and Bongino never fully embraced the conspiracy theory that Epstein was murdered, but the two men, particularly Bongino, have adopted what law enforcement officials say is an equally outlandish notion: the idea that the FBI secretly knows who planted pipe bombs in Washington hours before the Jan. 6 attack. In January,the FBI releasedwhat it said was new video of the masked person planting bombs outside the Republican and Democratic headquarters in Washington. But FBI officials said they hadn't identified a suspect or even determined for certain whether the figure was a man or a woman. Weeks before he was named deputy FBI director, Bongino accused the FBI of lying about the person on a podcast. "I believe the FBI knows the identity of this pipe bomber on January 6th, four years ago, and just doesn't want to tell us because it was an inside job,"he said. In an interview with conspiracy theorist and political commentator Julie Kelly, Bongino said, "I'm convinced the person who planted that pipe bomb at the DNC on January 6th was there to create a fake assassination attempt because they needed to stop Republicans from questioning in front of a national TV audience what happened in the 2020 election." Patel also espoused that view, saying in January that the pipe bomb could be a "government ruse" planted by a "rogue FBI source." Current and former FBI officials say there is no evidence to support any of those allegations. In an interview last week with Tucker Carlson, the former acting U.S. attorney in Washington, Ed Martin,accused Bonginoof ordering that the FBI personnel investigating the pipe bomb case be replaced. In the Fox Business interview, Bongino said the public needs the FBI to "get to the bottom" of the pipe bomber case. He didn't repeat his claim that the FBI knows who planted the bombs.

FBI leaders under pressure from MAGA voters to act on their corruption claims

FBI leaders under pressure from MAGA voters to act on their corruption claims For years, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino have said the Biden admi...
Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan voteNew Foto - Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote

WASHINGTON — The Senate advanced a major cryptocurrency regulation bill Monday on a bipartisan vote two weeks after every Senate Democratunited to block it. The procedural vote on the GENIUS Act — which would establish the first regulatory framework for issuers of stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar — was 66-32. The bill needed to cross the 60-vote threshold to advance to final passage in the Senate, where Republicans hold a three-seat majority. Democratic support to proceed with the legislation was unlocked after a group of bipartisan negotiators — Sens. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.; and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. — reached an agreement late last week on an amendment to the bill that addressed key sticking points for Democrats. The amendment, which Democratic negotiators circulated over the weekend and has been obtained by NBC News, includes new changes to consumer protection safeguards and limits on tech companies issuing stablecoins, and it would extend ethics standards to special government employees — which would temporarily apply to Elon Musk and tech entrepreneur David Sacks. In exchange for a vote on the amendment, Democrats involved in negotiations said they have committed to support the GENIUS Act even if the amendment fails, according to multiple sources familiar with the talks. Senate Republicans have been noncommittal about backing the amendment, but the updated changes are likely to get more Democrats on board beyond the core group involved in negotiations. The billhit a roadblocktwo weeks ago when Democrats, along with two Republicans — Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Josh Hawley of Missouri — blocked the bill from advancing, demanding stronger national security and anti-money laundering provisions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., criticized his colleagues across the aisle for delaying the vote, pointing out that no changes have been made to the underlying bill that Democrats blocked two weeks ago. "It's really hard to understand why we needed to wait an additional 11 days for Democrats to finally agree to move," Thune said Monday, adding that he expects the Senate won't vote on final passage before it leaves for the Memorial Day recess. The Trump family's crypto dealings with World Liberty Financial, and President Donald Trump'sdinner for the top holders of his meme coin, have aggravated concerns among Democrats. (Meme coins are different from stable coins meme coins, as they typically derive value from internet culture rather than from an underlying utility or asset.) But no provisions in the negotiated amendment would prohibit Trump and his family from continuing their crypto ventures. Thebill textincludes a provision that would "prohibit any member of Congress or senior executive branch official from issuing a payment stablecoin product during their time in public service." Some Democrats have argued it needs to be stronger. "Basic flaws remain unaddressed," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, said on the Senate floor Monday. "Congress should not choose to enable the president's egregious corruption." Several Senate Democrats have also introduced bills targeting the Trump family's crypto ventures to prevent the president from potentially profiting off of the deals. Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., for example, plans to offer legislation called the STABLE Act, which would prevent elected officials and federal candidates from issuing or endorsing digital assets, as an amendment to the GENIUS Act. Democrats are expected to force votes on those bills this week, but they are unlikely to go anywhere in the GOP-controlled chamber. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., convened a caucus-wide call Sunday night to discuss the GENIUS Act. Warren voiced her concerns about the bill during the call, according to a person with knowledge of her comments. While some Democrats like Warren said they can't vote for the bill without stronger provisions that limit Trump's profiting from digital assets, others, like Warner, argued that Congress can no longer sit on the sidelines of the evolving cryptocurrency space. "Many senators, myself included, have very real concerns about the Trump family's use of crypto technologies to evade oversight, hide shady financial dealings, and personally profit at the expense of everyday Americans," Warner, who voted to advance the GENIUS Act, wrote in a statement Monday. "But we cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality: blockchain technology is here to stay. If American lawmakers don't shape it, others will — and not in ways that serve our interests or democratic values," he added. If the Senate ultimately passes the GENIUS Act, its future is less clear in the House, where there is a different bill to regulate stablecoin issuers. Cryptocurrency advocates argue that Congress should also pass legislation to determine regulatory treatment of digital assets and digital asset securities. "The winners, if Congress passes this bill, are Americans who want to make payments faster and easier to access," said Kara Calvert, the vice president for public policy and Coinbase, a crypto currency exchange. "It's transformational technology, so passing this bill is a win for them. It's not just a win for the industry or a political candidate."

Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote

Senate advances a major crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote WASHINGTON — The Senate advanced a major cryptocurrency regulation bill ...
Kansas group fights campaign donor law it sees as a response to its success defending abortionNew Foto - Kansas group fights campaign donor law it sees as a response to its success defending abortion

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A group that successfully defeated an anti-abortion ballot measure in Kansas has filed a federal lawsuit against a new state law aimed at curbing foreign influence in elections, saying it violates free speech rights and would keep the group from waging future campaigns. Kansans for Constitutional Freedom argues thatthe lawtaking effect July 1 is a direct response to the decisiveAugust 2022 statewide voteagainst a proposed amendment to the Kansas Constitution that would have allowed the Legislature to greatly restrict or ban abortion. The group led the "no" campaign, and itslargest single donorwas the Sixteen Thirty Fund, tied to Hansjörg Wyss, a Swiss billionaire who lives in Wyoming and finances liberal causes. The Kansas group filed its lawsuit Friday in U.S. District Court in Kansas. "Kansas has adopted a series of impermissibly restrictive, overbroad and vague restrictions on issue-advocacy speech that will unconstitutionally impede public debates about some of the most important policy issues of our time," the lawsuit said. The law will take effect less than a year afterOhio movedto block foreign money in its elections. Kansas lawmakers heard committee testimony earlier this year from Ohio's Republican secretary of state, Frank LaRose, along with conservative groups, and theymentioned Wyss by nameas an example of why Kansas should enact its own law. Two groups and three individuals filed to suit to challenge Ohio's law almost immediately, but in October, a federal appeals court allowed Ohio to enforce it ahead of a trial of that lawsuit. Federal law bars foreign nationals from contributing to campaigns or political committees. But the new Kansas law will bar groups campaigning for or against proposed amendments to the state constitution from accepting contributions "directly or indirectly" from foreign nationals. The groups also will have to certify that no named donors received more than $100,000 from a foreign national during the previous four years, and groups violating the law can be barred from electioneering for four years. Kansans for Constitutional Freedom said it wants to raise money for a campaign in 2026 against a proposal from Republicans to amend the state constitution to end the governor's appointment of state Supreme Court justices andhave them elected instead.The group sees the measure as attacking the courts' independence. The group raised almost $11 million for its effort to defeat the anti-abortion ballot question in 2022, and nearly $1.5 million came from the Sixteen Thirty Fund, campaign finance reports show. The new Kansas law passed the Republican-controlled Legislature with more than the two-thirds majority required to override a veto. Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly said the measure "goes too far," but let it become law without her signature. Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a Republican named as a defendant in the lawsuit along with state ethics commission members, noted the law's bipartisan support. "Republicans and Democrats agree that foreign corporations and foreign citizens must not be allowed to influence the outcome when Kansas constitutional amendments are placed before voters," Kobach said in a statement Monday. "It is a core principle of self-government." In allowing Ohio to enforce its law, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said concerns about foreign influence in elections "date back to the Founding," citing first President George Washington's Farewell Address. "And Ohioans and their representatives have a compelling interest in regulating such influence," the appeals court majority said. But the Kansas law's restrictions fall on advocacy groups in prohibiting them from accepting federal funds. Also, groups must avoid donations even from U.S. citizens if they've received enough foreign funds — restricting their free speech rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as well, the lawsuit argues. "There is no reason why a donor should have to provide detailed and confidential information about its own funding sources," the lawsuit said.

Kansas group fights campaign donor law it sees as a response to its success defending abortion

Kansas group fights campaign donor law it sees as a response to its success defending abortion TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A group that successfully...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com