Reports: Eagles plan to start QB Tanner McKee, rest Jalen Hurts, other starters

The Philadelphia Eagles plan to start little-used quarterback Tanner McKee and rest Jalen Hurts and several other starters in the regular-season finale at home Sunday against the Washington Commanders, according to multiple reports on Wednesday.

The Eagles (11-5) cannot fall any lower than their current No. 3 seed in the NFC playoffs but would rise to No. 2 if they win and the Chicago Bears (11-5) lose to the Detroit Lions. Both games kick off at the same time late Sunday afternoon.

Philadelphia coach Nick Sirianni said Wednesday that the team would rest several starters and were "nearing" a decision, but he wanted to talk to players first at a team meeting.

McKee, 25, has appeared in three games this season as relief for Hurts and completed all three pass attempts for 33 yards. He is 33 of 48 for 356 yards and four touchdowns in five career games, winning his lone start 20-13 against the New York Giants to close out the 2024 regular season.

The Eagles selected McKee in the sixth round of the 2023 NFL Draft out of Stanford.

"When you see Tanner, he's really good about knowing where to go with the football, seeing the defense and being able to deliver things accurately," Sirianni said. "It's a great room where those guys feed off each other and learn from each other."

The Philadelphia Inquirer first reported that the Eagles plan to make 10 or so key starters inactive and suit up another 10 or so on the active roster but hop they rest against the Commanders (4-12), who lost at home to the Eagles 29-18 on Dec. 20.

Among those likely to rest are Hurts, running back Saquan Barkley, receivers A.J. Brown and DeVonta Smith, tight end Dallas Goedert, several offensive linemen and a host of defensive starters, per the Inquirer report.

--Field Level Media

Reports: Eagles plan to start QB Tanner McKee, rest Jalen Hurts, other starters

The Philadelphia Eagles plan to start little-used quarterback Tanner McKee and rest Jalen Hurts and several other star...
Mike Vrabel responds to Stefon Diggs, Christian Barmore charges

TwoNew England Patriotsplayers have been charged with assault in the last 36 hours.

Wide receiverStefon Diggsis facingfelony strangulation or suffocation charge as well as misdemeanor assaultas of Dec. 30. Defensive linemanChristian Barmoreis facingassault and battery chargesas of Dec. 31.

Coach Mike Vrabel has the team at 13-3 and fighting for the No. 1 seed in the AFC in his first year in New England.He was asked todayabout the charges against Diggs and Barmore as the team prepares for Week 18.

"We've been aware of these allegations," Vrabel said. "Yesterday and today isn't the first that we've heard about them. [We] try to do everything in accordance with the league policy and making sure that the league, that we're in compliance with the league."

Vrabel shot down any fears that Diggs and Barmore's legal proceedings would be a distraction for the other players.

"I'm 50 years old, going to be 51, I'm not afraid," Vrabel said. "I love coaching this football team."

The team put out a statement about both players and said the franchise is aware of reports regarding both Diggs and Barmore. The statements did not include comments because both are "ongoing legal matters," a stance Vrabel reiterated through much of his news conference today.

"There's ongoing legal matters," he said. "We've made a statement, we take these allegations seriously and what comes of that, then we'll have another discussion. I don't think we have to jump to any sort of conclusions right now and let the process take its toll."

Vrabel said Barmore likely will not be at practice today due to an illness. As of today, he considers both players available to play against theMiami Dolphinsin Week 18.

"I haven't heard anything that would keep either player from the game," Vrabel said. "The NFL hasn't told me anything... I haven't had a call with the NFL."

LIVE: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 12/31https://t.co/bnLd1hZnhZ

— z - New England Patriots (@Patriots)December 31, 2025

Mike Vrabel responds to Stefon Diggs, Christian Barmore charges

TwoNew England Patriotsplayers have been charged with assault in the last 36 hours. Wide receiverStefon Diggsis ...
Packers claim Trevon Diggs one day after Cowboys waived the veteran cornerback

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Trevon Diggs was claimed by the Green Bay Packers on Wednesday, a day after theDallas Cowboys waivedthe 2021 All-Pro cornerback.

This move enables Green Bay to boost its injury-riddled secondary by taking a chance on atwo-time Pro Bowl selectionseeking a career reset.

Diggs had an NFL-leading 11 interceptions and earned All-Pro honors with Dallas in 2021. He earned a second Pro Bowl selection the following year.

But his production dipped from there as he dealt with two major knee surgeries.

Diggs played six games this season beforesustaining a concussionin an accident at home on Oct. 16. Diggs didn't explain the cause of the injury to reporters until two months later, when he said he got hit in the head by a mounting pole while trying to install a TV.

Even after Diggs returned from concussion protocol, he remained off the field and ended up missing eight games. The Cowboys attributed hisdelayed returnto issues regarding his knees.

After Cowboys cornerback DaRon Bland suffered a season-ending foot injury, Diggs returned to action and played against the Los Angeles Chargers and Washington Commanders.

Though Dallas coach Brian Schottenheimer reiterated that Diggs' departure was a culmination of issues and not triggered by one incident, the move came five days after he didn't return from Washington with the team.

The Cowboys played the Commanders on Christmas and had three days off after that Thursday meeting. Schottenheimer said other players asked to make their own travel arrangements going home and were told no. The coach said Diggs didn't ask until the team was in the locker room after the 30-23 victory.

"It was one of many factors. It was not the only factor," said Schottenheimer, who briefly benched Diggs during the six games he played to start the season after the team withheld an offseason workout bonus because Diggs went through rehab on knee surgery with his own training staff away from the facility.

"I'm not the Grinch that stole Christmas, OK? I love Christmas. I love my family. But at the end of the day, we got a protocol we go through, and the process was not followed."

Schottenheimer disagreed with the suggestion that he never connected with Diggs in his first season as a head coach after a quarter-century as an NFL assistant. The son of the late NFL coach Marty Schottenheimer takes pride in his relationships with players.

"Believe me, I don't make these (decisions) casually," Schottenheimer said. "We didn't sit down and say, 'Hey, Trevon didn't take the plane.' No, it wasn't that. It was a culmination of multiple factors. And hey, this might be great for Trevon. Go find a permanent home. That's my hope for him is that he does that."

Green Bay needed a boost at cornerback after placing Kamal Hadden (ankle) and Nate Hobbs (knee) on injured reserve this week. Both players were knocked out of the Packers'41-24 lossto the Baltimore Ravens on Saturday.

The Packers did sign cornerbacks Shemar Bartholomew and Jaylin Simpson from their practice squad to their active roster on Tuesday.

Heading to Green Bay reunites Diggs withinjuredPackers defensive end Micah Parsons, who wasacquired from Dallasjust before the start of the season. Parsons and Diggs are good friends whoexchanged jerseysafter the Packers'40-all tiewith the Cowboys earlier this season.

Green Bay (9-6-1) carries a three-game skid into its regular-season finale Sunday at Minnesota. The Packers haveclinched a playoff berthas theNFC's No. 7 seed.

AP NFL:https://apnews.com/hub/nfl

Packers claim Trevon Diggs one day after Cowboys waived the veteran cornerback

GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Trevon Diggs was claimed by the Green Bay Packers on Wednesday, a day after theDallas Cowboys waiv...
US Coast Guard searches for survivors after strike on suspected drug vessels

By Idrees Ali and Jasper Ward

WASHINGTON, Dec 31 (Reuters) - The United States Coast Guard is searching for survivors of a U.S. military strike against a convoy of suspected drug vessels in ​the Pacific Ocean, U.S. officials said on Wednesday.

President Donald Trump's administration has carried out more than ‌30 strikes against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and Pacific since September in a campaign that has killed at least 110 ‌people.

In a statement, the U.S. military's Southern Command said the military had carried out a strike against three vessels.

"Three narco-terrorists aboard the first vessel were killed in the first engagement. The remaining narco-terrorists abandoned the other two vessels, jumping overboard and distancing themselves before follow-on engagements sank their respective vessels," Southern Command wrote on X.

Southern Command said later ⁠on Wednesday that it had carried ‌out a strike on two vessels. It did not indicate where the strikes were carried out but said five people were killed as result.

U.S. SEARCHING FOR 8 SURVIVORS: OFFICIAL

A ‍U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said eight people had abandoned their vessels and were being searched for.

The Coast Guard told Reuters it had deployed a C-130 aircraft to look for survivors and was working with vessels in the ​area.

This is not the first time there have been survivors of a U.S. strike under the Trump ‌administration. In October, two survivors were repatriated to their home countries after surviving a U.S. military strike.

Later that month, Mexican authorities launched a search and rescue effort after another U.S. strike left a survivor. That individual was not found.

The decision to strike the vessels but not the survivors comes after it was revealed that during a September attack, the U.S. military carried out a follow-on strike against a suspected drug vessel that had ⁠two survivors on it.

The lethal strikes on drug vessels are part ​of a broader campaign that the Trump administration says is aimed ​at cutting off the supply of illegal drugs. Legal experts and Democratic lawmakers have questioned the legality of the strikes.

The strikes come amid a pressure campaign against Venezuelan President ‍Nicolas Maduro's government and a ⁠massive U.S. military buildup in the region.

Trump said on Monday the U.S. had "hit" an area in Venezuela where boats are loaded with drugs, marking the first known time Washington has carried out land operations ⁠in Venezuela.

Officials said the land strike was not carried out by the U.S. military and Trump has previously said he has ‌authorized the CIA to carry out covert operations in Venezuela.

(Reporting by Idrees Ali. Additional reporting by ‌Jasper Ward; Editing by Rod Nickel and Raju Gopalakrishnan)

US Coast Guard searches for survivors after strike on suspected drug vessels

By Idrees Ali and Jasper Ward WASHINGTON, Dec 31 (Reuters) - The United States Coast Guard is searching for surv...
A distorted female face; a voter at a voting booth; a mother holds her baby. (NBC News; Getty Images)

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use of artificial intelligence in health care and elections, paid family and medical leave and rising medical insurance costs.

Some states are looking for ways to soften the blow of higher health care premiums as Affordable Care Act tax subsidies expire after Congress failed to extend them. And on the verge of the coming year's midterm elections, a slew of more restrictive voting laws are taking effect.

Here are some of the laws that go live in 2026:

Deepfakes in elections, AI misuse in health care

Thirty-eight states passed legislation this year to deal with the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, including on such topics as preventing the misuse of AI in elections and regulating how the technology disperses medical information, according to theNational Conference of State Legislatures.

AI will continue to be a top issue for states despite President Donald Trump'sexecutive orderin December seeking to limit state regulations on AI, said the group's CEO, Tim Storey.

Trump issued his executive order — which aimed to prevent a piecemeal, state-level approach to AI regulation in favor of "minimally burdensome national policy" for the use of the technology — after Congress was unable to pass legislation over the past year. As a result, it lacks the strength that legislation would provide to rein in state-level actions given that Congress has the exclusive power to pre-empt state laws under the Constitution.

"States have taken the lead, as they have in so many issues," Storey said at a recent news briefing. "AI is the big one."

In the absence of federal legislation, several states have taken action, including on the issues of so-called deepfakes in elections and AI as a medical resource.

Californiapassed legislationbarring AI developers and businesses from giving patients the impression that they are interacting with licensed health care professionals when they are really speaking with chatbots. Oregon enactedsimilar legislationpreventing AI programs from using the title "nurse" when they give medical advice.

Elsewhere,MontanaandSouth Dakotapassed laws this year that now require disclosures about using deepfakes in elections — measures that could come into play during next year's midterms.

Deepfakes, which are images, video or audio that are digitally altered to create false representations of people's statements or actions, have been used to cause confusion in state and national elections. During the 2024 presidential election, for example,NBC News reportedthat a political consultant used AI to create a robocall impersonating President Joe Biden, telling New Hampshire Democrats not to vote in the primary.

Congress has yet to pass legislation to prohibit deepfake content that could mislead voters during elections.

Paid family and medical leave

Maine,DelawareandMinnesotawill have paid family and medical leave policies going intoeffect in 2026, joining several other states that already provide such benefits. Maryland, Vermont and Washington also passed legislation expanding or amending existing paid family leave policies, with the latter state's changes taking effect this coming year. Paid family and medical leave allows employees to receive wages when they take leaves of absence for medical reasons, give birth or take care of family members.

Minnesota state Sen. Alice Mann, a physician who is a member of the state's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, sponsored the state's paid leave bill. She said witnessing her patients having to choose between taking care of themselves or loved ones and missing paychecks pushed her to back the legislation.

"I see people every single day who struggle. People are left with the choice of taking care of themselves, their family members, their new baby and not getting a paycheck anymore," Mann said. "And that's not an option that the rest of the world has to face."

Whilefederal lawprovides up to 12 weeks of unpaid job protection for people in need of medical or caretaking leave, the U.S. is the onlydeveloped economywithout paid parental or medical leave. It's also one of the only countries that don't provide paid sick leave at anational level.

Mann said that while Minnesota's legislation was passed in 2023, time was needed before it was implemented for people to actually know that the bill existed and understand how it works. That involved a $5 million public information campaign to educate "employers and community groups on what this policy is, what it does and how you participate," she said.

Delaware's and Maine's policies, which were passed in 2022 and 2023, respectively, also go into effect this coming year.

"It's a very popular policy, again, because we're all human beings, for crying out loud, and if it wasn't popular, we wouldn't be the only country left without it, right?" Mann said. "It is sustainable. It is something that we all use. And so I hope, I expect, that other states will see this, realize this and move to have their own policies in place."

Lapsing Obamacare subsidies

All 50 states will face rising health care costs starting in January after Congress was unable to pass legislation to extend expiring Obamacare premium subsidies before the end of the year.

In an August special session, Colorado became one of the few states toenact legislationaimed at softening the blow of the rising premiums, dedicating $100 million to offset premium hikes in the state's health care exchange.

State Rep. Kyle Brown, a Democrat who sponsored the bill, said the $100 million will serve as "a bridge" for 2026, ensuring that Colorado has funds to sustain some subsidizing of its health care exchange and "cushion the blow" from the lapse in federal subsidies.

"Before we passed the bill, people's premiums on average were expected to go up by 175% in Colorado. We passed the bill, and now they're only going up by 100%," Brown said. "Which is still like 'yeah, instead of tripling, they're doubling.' But it could have been worse."

According to KFF, a health policy research group, Affordable Care Act premium payments are likely to more than double because of the expiring subsidies. In Colorado, premiums for about 225,00 people will increase by anaverage of 101%, according to the state Insurance Division.

Brown said that he had hoped Congress would extend the Obamacare subsidies but that he came to the realization that the funds weren't coming through after having watched the U.S. government shut down for six weeks last fall — the longest federal funding lapse in the country's history — as Democratic and Republican lawmakers deadlocked over the issue. Rising health care prices and the high cost of living overall are expected to be top issues in the 2026 midterms.

"It feels like states are on their own. We don't have a willing partner in the federal government anymore, and so we have to do what we can to take care of our folks and make health care as affordable and accessible as possible," Brown said.

Stricter voting laws

This past year, 20 states passed 37 bills to restrict voting access and elections, according to theVoting Rights Lab, a nonprofit organization that tracks voting- and election-related legislation and aims to expand ballot access. That's the most since 2021, it said.

Meanwhile, 23 states passed 51 bills intended to improve voting and elections, the group found, saying that is the fewest such measures since it started tracking state legislation.

Kansas and North Dakotaeliminated grace periodsfor mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving afterward, and eight states passed legislation to restrict or eliminate alternatives to photo ID as proof of voter registration, according to the Voting Rights Lab.

Many of the states that passed such bills might have been influenced byTrump's executive orderin March that pushed for broad changes in how the U.S. conducts its elections, said Chris Vasquez, director of legislative tracking at the Voting Rights Lab.

"I think the main thrust of the story of the year is sort of Trump in March issuing this executive order," Vasquez said.

The order aimed to require that people provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote and required mail-in ballots to be sent in before Election Day. While the proof-of-citizenship requirement wasblocked in U.S. District Court in Washington as an executive branch overreach, certain states have passed legislation mirroring other policies in the executive order.

"We did see 27 states introduce some sort of restrictive proof-of-citizenship legislation this year, which is triple what we saw in the previous legislative session," Vasquez said. "That, for the most part, wasn't successful. But then, where you did see some more activity was on the mail ballot deadline side."

In 2026, he said, Vasquez will be keeping an eye onstate redistrictingand a relatedSupreme Court casethat could limit the scope of the Voting Rights Act as harbingers of what could develop at the state level, including efforts to protect against further voting restrictions.

"I think, especially looking at the Supreme Court potentially really curtailing the ability of plaintiffs to bring Voting Rights Act claims in federal court, these state voting rights acts are essentially something to keep an eye on into potential work against potentially voter suppressive laws," he said.

New laws in 2026 target AI and deepfakes, paid leave and rising Obamacare premiums

As the country prepares to ring in the new year, new state laws will take effect around the country on a host of issues, including the use ...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com