Who Is Leonard Leo and Why Did Trump Call Him a 'Sleazebag'?New Foto - Who Is Leonard Leo and Why Did Trump Call Him a 'Sleazebag'?

Leonard Leo, co-chariman of the Federalist Society board of directors, speaks at the University of Cambridge in England on March 11, 2025.
Credit - Nordin Catic/Getty Images for The Cambridge Union "A real 'sleazebag'" and "bad person." Someone who "probably hates America." The latest target of Donald Trump's insults, however, is the very same whom he once credited with what he would later call "one of the greatest achievements" of his presidency. "We're going to have great judges, conservative, all picked by the Federalist Society," Trump promised during his first campaign in 2016. It was the result of a meeting in March 2016 with Leonard Leo, then the executive vice president of the Federalist Society, a conservative organization that advocates for legaloriginalism. True to his promise, Trump would go on to consult Leo for judicial nominations, including his three Supreme Court picks. Read More:Inside Trump's Plan to Dramatically Reshape U.S. Courts[From 2018] "What we're doing with the courts, I think, is going to go down as one of the greatest achievements," Trump said during his first term. But on Thursday, Trump had changed his tune. "I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges," hepostedon his social media platform Truth Social. "I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. He openly brags how he controls Judges, and even Justices of the United States Supreme Court—I hope that is not so, and don't believe it is! In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own 'thing.' I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten! With all of that being said, I am very proud of many of our picks, but very disappointed in others." Trump's rant came after a federal three-judge panelruledthat he didn't have the authority to impose most of the tariffs he'd announced so far in his second term, a key part of his economic agenda and promise to bringmanufacturing jobsback to America. Leo, in response, offered a less combative response. "I'm very grateful for President Trump transforming the Federal Courts, and it was a privilege being involved," he said ina statement. "There's more work to be done, for sure, but the Federal Judiciary is better than it's ever been in modern history, and that will be President Trump's most important legacy." Here's what to know about Leo and the Federalist Society—and their falling out with Trump. Founded in 1982by a group of law school studentsas a pro-originalism organization for law students, the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies has been describedas"the single most influential advocacy organization in Washington." The organization—which counts over 90,000 lawyers, law students, scholars, and others among its members—describes itselfas "a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order." But that puts it mildly: the organization, especially under Leo's leadership, has been credited with creating a "pipeline," utilizing its vast network, for conservative law students to make their way into positions of influence—ideally, all the way up to the Supreme Court. A2023 studyshowed that, in the current confirmation process, a judicial nominee's affiliation with the Federalist Society increased the probability of a successful Senate confirmation by around 20%. In 2021, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D, R.I.)flaggedthat 86% of Trump's Supreme Court or appellate court nominees were or are members of the group. Six of the nine sitting Supreme Court justices—Chief Justice John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are linked to the Federalist Society, particularly through Leo. ProPublicadescribed the Federalist Society as part of "a machine that remade the American legal system." It described Leo as the man who "built" that machine. The conservative legal activist joined the Federalist Society in 1989, when he started a student chapter of the organization while studying law in Cornell. For many years, he served as executive vice president of the organization until he stepped back in 2020, though he remains co-chair of its board of directors. Leo's most significant and long-lasting impact is probably his work related to the makeup of the Supreme Court. In 1990, before he even began officially working for the Federalist Society, as a 25-year-old clerk for a U.S. Court of Appeals judge in Washington, he met then-appellate judge Thomas, whom he befriended and helped through his Supreme Court confirmation in 1991. During the George W. Bush Administration, Leo organized efforts to lobby for the nominations of Roberts and Alito. And during Trump's first term, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett were all selected from a list reportedly "personally curated" by Leo. But the Federalist Society isn't the only powerful organization Leo has championed. "The network of increasingly influential conservative groups that Leonard A. Leo has helped to create and shape is not easily defined or quantified," theNew York Timesreportedin 2022. Many of those groups have funding sources that have been difficult to trace and have funnelled billions of dollars to conservative causes,including groupsthat had been preparing for Trump's second term. Politicoreported that the relationship between Leo and Trump became strained when the three conservative justices Trump appointed to the Supreme Court on Leo's advice "did not intervene to keep Trump in office after he lost the 2020 presidential election." Leo, however, has generally refrained from publicly criticizing Trump—and the Federalist Society has reportedly appeared "ambivalent" about Trump's second-term Administration so far, compared to itsenthusiasmduring his first—though Trump's tariffs appear to be a major breaking point. In April, the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a group affiliated with Leo,mounteda legal challenge against levies imposed on Chinese imports,arguingthat the President misapplied the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) cited to order the tariffs. While that case remains ongoing, the U.S. Court of International Trade found that Trump misused the same presidential authority in aruling this weekon separate tariff cases. Trump'ssocial-media outburstagainst the judges on that court and against Leo and the Federalist Society came as his Administration has increasingly challenged the authority of the judicial branch torein in his powers. Still, the President may be relying on Leo's greatest accomplishment to ultimately push his agenda through. "Hopefully," Trump added in his social media post, "the Supreme Court will reverse this horrible, Country threatening decision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY." Contact usatletters@time.com.

Who Is Leonard Leo and Why Did Trump Call Him a ‘Sleazebag’?

Who Is Leonard Leo and Why Did Trump Call Him a 'Sleazebag'? Leonard Leo, co-chariman of the Federalist Society board of directors, ...
EU trade chief says he held another call with US's LutnickNew Foto - EU trade chief says he held another call with US's Lutnick

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -European Union Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on Friday that he had held another call with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, as the EU and the United States continue efforts to reach a deal on tariffs. "Another call with U.S. Secretary @howardlutnick. Our time and effort fully invested, as delivering forward-looking solutions remains a top EU priority. Staying in permanent contact," wrote Sefcovic on X. The EU wants to see an end to 25% tariffs on steel and cars and for Trump to drop his so-called "reciprocal" tariff, which was provisionally set at 20% for the EU but is being held at 10% during a 90-day pause until July. Sefcovic said earlier this week in Dubai that the European Commission was in talks with Washington on possible cooperation in sectors such as aerospace, steel, semiconductors and critical minerals. (Reporting by Sudip Kar-Gupta, Editing by Charlotte Van Campenhout and Tomasz Janowski)

EU trade chief says he held another call with US's Lutnick

EU trade chief says he held another call with US's Lutnick BRUSSELS (Reuters) -European Union Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said on ...
Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under US crackdownNew Foto - Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under US crackdown

By Laurie Chen BEIJING (Reuters) -Caught in the middle of Washington's renewed visa crackdown on Chinese international students, Beijing postgraduate Lainey is anxiously waiting to resume the visa process to study a PhD at her dream school, the University of California. "We feel helpless and unable to do anything," said the 24-year-old sociology student, who declined to give her surname for privacy reasons. "The situation in North America this year is not very good. From applying for my PhD until now, this series of visa policies is not very favourable to us. But we have no choice but to wait." The U.S. State Department said on Thursday it would not tolerate the "exploitation" of American universities or theft of U.S. research and intellectual property by Beijing. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce did not elaborate on how many Chinese students would be affected by a new plan announced on Wednesday to "aggressively" revoke visas. The visa crackdown is the latest in a series of moves targeting the international student community, especially Chinese nationals, who make up roughly 1 in 4 of all international students in the U.S., as the Trump administration pursues its hardline immigration agenda. If applied to a broad segment of the 277,000 Chinese students already at U.S. colleges, the visa revocations could disrupt a major source of income for universities and a crucial pipeline of talent for U.S. technology companies. Chinese students make up 16% of all graduate science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) students in the United States. DEFER ENROLMENT? The announcement on Chinese student visa holders came after the Trump administration ordered its missions worldwide to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants. If the visa appointment system is not resumed soon, Lainey wishes to defer enrolment for a year. "Although everyone says the U.S. admissions system may be biased against Chinese students, in reality U.S. schools are indeed the top in terms of academic quality," she said. "I may also consider (applying to) some places outside the U.S., such as Europe, as well as Hong Kong and Singapore." The measures are a sign of the increasing spillover from a bruising trade war between the two global superpowers, and threaten to derail a fragile truce reached mid-May in Geneva. A Friday editorial by China's state-owned Global Times newspaper said the new visa measures raised "the spectre of McCarthyism" and likened them to an "educational witch-hunt". "In recent years, the suppression of Chinese students has increasingly become an important part of the U.S. strategy to contain China," the commentary said. Potentially even more damaging than the immediate economic impact for the U.S. could be a long-term erosion of the appeal of U.S. universities and the subsequent brain drain. International students - 54% of them from India and China - contributed more than $50 billion to the U.S. economy in 2023, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. "If I really have to wait until 2026 to reapply, I might not have such positive feelings towards America," said Lainey. "If I can't even get a visa, then I'd have no choice but to go somewhere else." (Reporting by Laurie Chen; Additional reporting by Tiffany Le; editing by Sophie Walker)

Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under US crackdown

Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under US crackdown By Laurie Chen BEIJING (Reuters) -Caught in the middle of Washington's ...
U.S.-China trade talks 'a bit stalled' and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Bessent saysNew Foto - U.S.-China trade talks 'a bit stalled' and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Bessent says

BEIJING — U.S.-China trade talks "are a bit stalled," requiring the two countries' leaders to speak directly, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessenttold Fox Newsin an interview Thursday local time. "I believe that we will be having more talks with them in the next few weeks," he said, adding that there may be a call between the two countries' leaders "at some point." South Korea's Hybe opens China office amid hopes of a K-pop reversal from Beijing Musk's SpaceX town in Texas warns residents they may lose right to 'continue using' their property Synopsys pulls full-year guidance, citing new China export restrictions After a rapid escalation in trade tensions last month, Bessent helped the world's two largest economies reach abreakthrough agreementin Switzerland on May 12. The countries agreed toroll back recent tariff increases of more than 100%for 90 days, or until mid-August. Diplomatic officials from both sides had acall late last week. Still, the U.S. has pushed ahead withtech restrictionson Beijing, drawing its ire, while China has yet to significantly ease restrictions on rare earths,contrary to Washington's expectations. "I think that given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity, that this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other," Bessent said. "They have a very good relationship and I am confident that the Chinese will come to the table when President [Donald] Trump makes his [preferences] known." Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last spoke in January, just before the U.S. president was sworn in for his second term. While Trump has in recent weekssaid he would like to speak with Xi, analysts expect China to agree to that only if there is certainty that there will be no surprises from the U.S. during the call. China has maintained communication with the U.S. since the agreement in Switzerland, Chinese Ministry of Commerce Spokesperson He Yongqian told reporters at a regular briefing Thursday. But regarding chip export controls, she said that "China again urges the U.S. to immediately correct its wrong practices ... and together safeguard the consensus reached at high-level talks in Geneva." That's according to a CNBC translation of her Mandarin-language remarks. When asked whether China would suspend rare earths export controls announced in early April, He did not respond directly. Restrictions on items that could have both military and civilian applications reflect international practice, as well as China's position of "upholding world peace and regional stability," she said. This week, the Trump administration also announced it would startrevoking visas for Chinese students. "The U.S. decision to revoke Chinese student visas is fully unjustified," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said Thursday, according to an official English transcript. "It uses ideology and national security as pretext."

U.S.-China trade talks 'a bit stalled' and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Bessent says

U.S.-China trade talks 'a bit stalled' and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Bessent says BEIJING — U.S.-China trade talks "are a ...
Scorecard: How Musk and DOGE could end up costing more than they saveNew Foto - Scorecard: How Musk and DOGE could end up costing more than they save

A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for freehere. Rather than set government straight,Elon Musk is leaving Washingtonwith the federal budget all cattywampus. Deficit spending is increasing, not waning, and there is a growing school of thought that his "efficiency" effort could end up costing the government as much as or more than it saved. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO came to Washington with a cut-till-it-hurts mindset and carte blanche from President Donald Trump. Musk quickly dialed back his campaign-trail bravado of cutting$2 trillionfrom the federal budget, but as recently as aFox News interviewin March, he said that by the time he left government, his Department of Government Efficiency "will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars…." Instead, Musk will leave government work "disappointed" that the Republicans he helped put in power are working to pass a bill that is estimated to addsome $3.8 trillion in deficit spendingand which Trump calls "big" and "beautiful." There's no accounting trick to correct that imbalance. The budget is trillions out of whack, and the shock-and-awe campaign Musk and Trump imposed across the federal workforce has led to some seriousPTSD for federal workersand contractors while claiming only to have saved $175 billion. That's not chump change, but it's not going to radically reform the US government. What's listed on the still-rudimentary DOGE website is also not an accurate reflection of what the group might actually have accomplished. DOGE will live on in the White House, "like Buddhism" without Buddha, Musk has said, andCNN has reportedthat more cuts are planned after his departure. But the pace of DOGE activity has slowed, at least as reflected on its website. Musk's departure is an opportunity to consider whether the Department of Government Efficiency has lived up to its name. CNN's Casey Tolan is among the reporters who have been trying to match what DOGE claims to have saved or cut with what has actually been trimmed. Picking apart the "estimated savings" of $175 billion on the DOGE website, Tolan told me that less than half that figure is backed up with even the most basic documentation. That means it's possible only even to start investigating about $32 billion of savings from terminated contracts, $40 billion of savings from terminated grants and $216 million of savings from terminated leases that DOGE claims. Plus, some of the specific terminations that are included in those numbers have no details at all. And Tolanhas reportedon the fact that DOGE's tally has "been marred by various errors and dubious calculations throughout the entire time they've been releasing this info." Probably not. The figure is based on "161 million individual federal taxpayers," according to the DOGE website, which drastically undercounts taxpayers in the US. That 161 million figure is more likely a reflection of individual tax returns and would not reflect married people who file jointly, according toBetsey Stevenson, a former chief economist at the US Department of Labor during the Obama administration who is now a professor at the University of Michigan. "This distinction is about trying to get that number as large as possible. If instead it was expressed as per American then it would be $514," and only if you assume DOGE has saved $175 billion, which it probably has not, she told me in an email. Workers who generated revenue from the government have been fired, Stevenson points out. For example, staffing cuts at the IRS will mean the US brings in less revenue — but so will operating national parks short-staffed. Plus, a universe of litigation related to DOGE's efforts to cancel contracts and fire workers seemingly without cause is percolating through courts. "In total, estimates suggest that what has been spent to generate these cuts may be as great as the cuts. In the long run, it's not clear that DOGE generated any savings," she said. Max Stier, CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, has estimated in a back-of-the-envelope way that DOGE cuts could end up costing the US $135 billion simply because it will need to retrain and rehire elements of the work force that have been let go. The federal workforce is literally in trauma — something Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought, said was an aim of his. Stier estimates the federal workers will be much less productive after DOGE's efforts, for a variety of reasons. Workers are now worried about losing jobs; their morale is depleted; they are distracted from their work; and many top performers are being reassigned or are leaving entirely. In a previous interview, Stier described the DOGE effort to me as "arson of a public asset." We probably can't, according to Nat Malkus, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who has tried to keep track of DOGE's accounting for its cuts. While Musk has promised maximum transparency, it has been impossible to verify much of what DOGE has said it has done. "We expect the government to show receipts," Malkus told me in a phone interview. "And the receipts that DOGE has shown that are posted publicly are nonetheless woefully inadequate to back their claims," he said. Far from fundamentally changing government, the savings DOGE claims won't actually be realized unless and until Congress, which has the power of the purse in the Constitution, passes a rescission bill to claw back the funding. "So far, we've just canceled contracts," he said. "The money is still spent because Congress spends the money." The DOGE effort has certainly changed the tenor of the conversation around government spending. Its aggressiveness came as a shock to many Americans. "They have shown that they're willing to inflict pain in the pursuit of reducing government expenditures," Malkus said, adding that most Americans think the government spends too much money. "That resolve is something rare and potentially valuable," Malkus said. DOGE also brought in a tech mindset of cutting more than is necessary with the aim of building back, something that could be argued occurred with therehiring of nuclear safety workers, for instance, or the reinstatement of certain contracts. Jessica Tillipman,an expert in government procurement law at George Washington University, is troubled by the idea that the government has gone from being the best business partner to one contractors approach with caution. "The government's not acting like a good business partner right now," Tillipman said. "They're squeezing contracts that have been fairly negotiated between the government and contractors." It's always possible DOGE could end up reforming government in positive ways, but the evidence is not yet there, Tillipman said. "What have we seen? You require everybody to come back to work and you don't have office space," she said as one example. "You have people doing work that they're not trained to do. You have talent drains," Tillipman said, pointing out that most of the government firings so far were among recently hired workers often brought on with a particular expertise. "Half the training programs for the government have been canceled, so these pipelines that the government spent decades working on to make sure that there's a steady supply and the government's an attractive place for high-quality talent have gone away." The long-term effect of those changes will not be clear for some time. "There's a long way to go before this is going to actually shift the way agencies work," Malkus said. "It just takes longer than four months." Stevenson pointed out that despite everything DOGE claimed to do, government outlays are on track to rise by 9% in 2025 compared with 2024. That's because Americans are living longer and drawing more from programs like Medicare and Social Security. It's those programs that are driving the deficit and debt, not the discretionary spending Musk targeted. "Chainsaws and bluster can't solve the yawning gap between revenue and spending that has led American debt to rise to unsustainable levels," Stevenson said. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Scorecard: How Musk and DOGE could end up costing more than they save

Scorecard: How Musk and DOGE could end up costing more than they save A version of this story appeared in CNN's What Matters newsletter....

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com