House budget package expands pro-energy initiatives, reversing Biden policiesNew Foto - House budget package expands pro-energy initiatives, reversing Biden policies

(The Center Square) – Energy policies included in the U.S. House budget reconciliation package represent a "significant shift in U.S. energy policy," those in the Texas energy sector argue. This is after the industry hasexpressed trepidationover Trump energy and tariff policies that created uncertainty in the market by driving up costs, reducing domestic output and dissuading domestic producers from investing in exploration and expanded production, The Center Squarereported. While the Texas oil and natural gas industry reported job gains in January and February, it reported losses in March for the first time in months as rig counts dropped, The Center Square reported. The industry slightly rebounded in April, according to the latest employment data, The Center Squarereported. Uncertainty in the industry remains due to federal energy policies and "numerous economic and geopolitical factors" that continue to impact domestic production and related investment decisions, the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO) said. This includes Trump administration tariffs on steel and aluminum and encouraging OPEC+ countries to increase production, driving down domestic production and profits, The Center Square reported. However, a positive development is a commitment to reversing Biden administration-era policies, TIPRO notes. This includes Congress prioritizing pro-energy policies in its budget reconciliation bill, referred to by President Donald Trump as one "big, beautiful bill." The policies include expanding federal fossil fuel leasing, reducing royalty rates, streamlining the permitting process, repealing so-called clean energy incentives, refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and delaying the Methane Emissions Reduction Program (MERP). The proposals were included in the energy sections of the House Ways and Means Committee and House Natural Resources Committee packages, including prioritizing expanding fossil fuel production, TIPRO notes. The sections were included in the package before the House Budget Committee, whichfailed to advanceit on Friday. TIPRO and othershave called forprioritizing domestic energy production, expanding critical infrastructure, including LNG ports and pipelines, protecting key tax provisions essential to the industry, among other priorities. Included in the House package is a requirement for at least 30 oil and natural gas lease sales to be made on federal land and in the Gulf of America over the next 15 years. In Alaska, it requires six lease sales for Cook Inlet and authorizes leasing to begin in the National Petroleum Reserve and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It also reinstates quarterly onshore oil and gas lease sales, generating an estimated $12 billion in revenue, TIPRO notes. House energy proposals also reduce royalty rates to 12.5% for onshore and offshore drilling, down from 16.67% and 18.75%, respectively, and put processes in place to increase permitting approvals for energy projects. House Republicans also repealed provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, including clean energy incentives that provided tax credits for electric vehicles and renewable energy projects. They also curtailed the hydrogen production credit and expired "technology neutral" clean energy credits by 2031, TIPRO notes. The House proposal also allocated $1.5 billion to replenish the SPR and delayed MERP by 10 years. "With the exponential growth in energy demand forecasted in the coming years, oil and natural gas will continue to play a dominant role, but we must have the right strategy in place to provide regulatory and economic certainty to our members for the benefit of our country and allies," TIPRO President Ed Longanecker said. With Texas continuing to lead the U.S. in oil and natural gas production, emissions reductions and job growth, "sound policies that support fair business practices and laws that keep our state competitive are necessary if Texas is going to continue to benefit from oil and natural gas activity," Texas Oil & Gas Association President Todd Staples said.

House budget package expands pro-energy initiatives, reversing Biden policies

House budget package expands pro-energy initiatives, reversing Biden policies (The Center Square) – Energy policies included in the U.S. Hou...
Scott Bessent calls Moody's a 'lagging indicator' after U.S. credit downgradeNew Foto - Scott Bessent calls Moody's a 'lagging indicator' after U.S. credit downgrade

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview on NBC News' "Meet the Press" thatMoody's Ratingswere a "lagging indicator" after the group downgraded the U.S.' credit rating by a notch from the highest level. "I think that Moody's is a lagging indicator," Bessent said Sunday. "I think that's what everyone thinks of credit agencies." Moody's said last week that the downgrade from Aaa to Aa1 "reflects the increase over more than a decade in government debt and interest payment ratios to levels that are significantly higher than similarly rated sovereigns." The treasury secretary asserted that the downgrade was related to the Biden administration's spending policies, which thatadministrationhad touted as investments in priorities, including combatting climate change and increasing health care coverage. "Just like Sean Duffy said with our air traffic control system, we didn't get here in the past 100 days," Bessent continued, referring to the transportation secretary. "It's the Biden administration and the spending that we have seen over the past four years." The U.S. has $36.22 trillion in national debt,according to the Treasury Department. It began growing steadily in the 1980s and continued increasing during both President Donald Trump's first term and former President Joe Biden's administration. Bessent also told moderator Kristen Welker that he spoke on the phone with the CEO of Walmart, Doug McMillon, who the treasury secretary said told him the retail giant would "eat some of the tariffs, just as they did in '18, '19 and '20." Walmart CFO John David Raineypreviously told CNBCthatWalmart would absorbsome higher costs related to tariffs. The CFO had alsotold CNBCseparately that he was "concerned" consumers would "start seeing higher prices," pointing to tariffs. Trump said in a post to Truth Social last week that Walmart should "eat the tariffs." Walmart responded, saying the company has "always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won't stop." "We'll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can given the reality of small retail margins," the statement continued. When asked about his conversation, Bessent denied he applied any pressure on Walmart to "eat the tariffs," noting that he and the CEO "have a very good relationship." "I just wanted to hear it from him, rather than second-, third-hand from the press," Bessent said. McMillon had said on Walmart'searnings callthat tariffs have put pressure on prices. Bessent argued that companies "have to give the worst case scenario" on the calls.

Scott Bessent calls Moody's a 'lagging indicator' after U.S. credit downgrade

Scott Bessent calls Moody's a 'lagging indicator' after U.S. credit downgrade Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interv...
Zelenskiy meets U.S. Vice President Vance, says source in Ukrainian delegationNew Foto - Zelenskiy meets U.S. Vice President Vance, says source in Ukrainian delegation

KYIV (Reuters) - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy met U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of Pope Leo's inauguration on Sunday, a source in the Ukrainian delegation told Reuters. It was the first meeting between Zelenskiy and Vance since they clashed during talks at the White House in February over the future of the war in Ukraine. (Reporting by Pavel Polityuk, writing by Olena Harmash; Editing by Gareth Jones)

Zelenskiy meets U.S. Vice President Vance, says source in Ukrainian delegation

Zelenskiy meets U.S. Vice President Vance, says source in Ukrainian delegation KYIV (Reuters) - Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy ...
Trump the GrifterNew Foto - Trump the Grifter

In the years before the Constitution was written, two of the most famous figures of the American Revolution were caught up in controversy over fears of undue foreign influence caused by their receipt of opulent gifts from European kings. One was a goldsnuff boxencrusted with 408 diamonds that King Louis XVI of France gave to Benjamin Franklin. The other wasa horse, given to John Jay by the King of Spain. Both of these gifts were publicly reported to the new Confederation Congress, and despite vocal public objection, both men kept the gifts. The controversies were still ripe in the minds of American leaders when they soon went to draft a new constitution. They worried that large and valuable gifts might inappropriately influence American officials in their dealings with foreign states—that a snuff box or a horse could psychologically warm a person to another country, distorting his ability to put America's interests first. To prevent that distortion, the drafters made anti-corruption provisions a cornerstone of the new constitution. Indeed, if the frequency of their attention to a particular issue is a measure of how significant their concern was, then few issues were as alarming to them as corruption, which the original Constitution explicitly addresses in four separate instances—plus a fifth that was later added. President Donald Trump's instinct for self-enrichment is a horrific exemplar of what the Founders hoped to prevent: a president profiting from public office. Trump's ventures—intending to accept the gift of a Qatari jet, profiting from the sale of a self-referential cryptocurrency, auctioning off a chance to have dinner with him—all reflect his disregard for the Founders' concern. Two of the Constitution's efforts to restrict conflicts of interest are direct and distinct prohibitions on profiteering by the president. One of these (in Article II, Section 1) was an absolute ban on domestic gifts to the president: Aside from compensation for his service, "he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them."Emolument, a word first recorded in the 15th century, signifies a "profit or gain arising from station, office, or employment." That is, making money off one's position by, say, selling favors to fellow citizens (for example,the opportunity to dine with the president) is expressly prohibited. [Yair Rosenberg: The darker design behind Trump's $400 million plane] The second prohibition (in Article I, Section 9) was conditional. Presidents may not "accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State" without Congress's consent. In other words, the answer to the offer of a personal gift (such asthe use of an airplaneeither during or after presidential service) is a constitutionally required "no," unless Congress affirmatively authorizes it. Rejecting a gift is not "stupid," as Trump suggested—it's required by the law of the land, and for good reason. In addition to these direct limitations on presidential conduct, also notable is that the impeachment clause (Article II, Section 4), which generally authorizes impeachment for "high crimes and misdemeanors" names two (and only two) crimes specifically as grounds for impeachment: treason and bribery—receipt of a giftin exchange for an official act. Not all gifts are bribes, but some are, and those would be grounds for removal from office. Beyond these three instances, the Constitution twice addresses the problem of possible profiteering by other federal officials, namely members of Congress: in Article I, Section 6 and in the Twenty-Seventh Amendment (which restricts Congress's ability to increase its own pay, and which was originally proposed in 1789). What animated the Founders' fear of conflicts of interest? An understanding of human nature and a respect for history. First they recognized that influence could be readily purchased from unprincipled leaders. As Alexander Hamilton put it in "Federalist No. 22": "One of the weak sides of republics, among their numerous advantages, is that they afford too easy an inlet to foreign corruption." Commenting on human nature, he went on to explain: "In republics, persons elevated from the mass of the community, by the suffrages of their fellow-citizens, to stations of great preeminence and power, may find compensations for betraying their trust, which to any but minds animated and guided by superior virtue, may appear to exceed the proportion of interest they have in the common stock, and to over-balance the obligations of duty." In short, Hamilton argued, the average citizen might (unless he or she was a person of "superior virtue") put their own financial interests above their duty to the country. [Jonathan Lemire and Russell Berman: The MAGA-world rift over Trump's Qatari jet] The requirement of congressional consent for foreign gifts persists today. When I served as a minor official at the Department of Homeland Security 20 years ago (I was the acting assistant secretary for international affairs and routinely interacted with foreign officials), any ceremonial gifts above a de minimis limit that foreign officials gave me as part of my official duties were, as constitutionally required, turned over to the department for receipt, processing, and storage. Congressional consent to keep a few small gifts was authorizedby the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act. Trump's proposed acceptance of the Qatari jet,which he plans to use after he leaves office, stems from his view that Qatar is a country "we have successfully defended for many years" with a "special royal family." This sort of conflict of interest is precisely what the Founders feared. Americans cannot know now whether Qatari security continues to be in America's best interests or only in Trump's desire to please his "special" friends. That doubt is exactly why the Framers adopted a formal practice of requiring the notice and consent of Congress before foreign gifts may be accepted. An unfortunate flaw in the Founders' design was that they anticipated ready compliance with the prohibition on gift receipt. I think they could have barely imagined a president accepting a personal gift without congressional consent despite the express words of the constitutional text. Nor could they have readily imagined a president soliciting personal benefits to himself or his family as a condition of access to and influence on his decision making. Perhaps even more to the point, in the absence of such compliance, the Framers no doubt anticipated aggressive congressional oversight to enforce the obligations of consent, buttressed by the ultimate remedy of impeachment to compel compliance. And they might even have anticipated enforcement of the anti-emolument provisions in the courts. But Congress today is supine—this, perhaps more than anything, is what they could not possibly have imagined. And when, in the first Trump administration, emoluments cases were brought in the courts, they were delayed until after Trump left office and ultimately dismissed, leaving openquestions of standingandsubstantive scope. All of which puts the nation in an exceedingly uncomfortable place. The emoluments clauses were integral to how the Founders sought to constrain human nature, fearful as they were of self-interest triumphing over constitutional duty. But today, faced with a president who seemingly has no concern for constitutional limitations, the carefully crafted restrictions of the Constitution appear to be unenforceable; the courts are ineffective, and Congress doesn't seem to care. The Framers, one suspects, would weep. Article originally published atThe Atlantic

Trump the Grifter

Trump the Grifter In the years before the Constitution was written, two of the most famous figures of the American Revolution were caught up...
Mediators make fresh push for peace in Gaza as death toll spikes from new Israeli campaignNew Foto - Mediators make fresh push for peace in Gaza as death toll spikes from new Israeli campaign

International mediators are making renewed efforts to reach a truce in Gaza after Israel launched a majornew offensivein the territory, as the health ministry there reported more than 100 people killed in intense overnight strikes. On Saturday, Hamas and Israel started indirect negotiations in the Qatari capital Doha to reach a ceasefire and hostages deal. Senior Hamas official Taher Al-Nunu confirmed the resumption of talks in Doha, saying, "We have agreed to the current round of negotiations without preconditions," according to Hamas-run al Aqsa TV. Israel's Defense Minister Israel claimed Saturday that its new military operation had pushed Hamas to the negotiating table. "With the launch of Operation 'Gideon's Chariots' in Gaza… the Hamas delegation in Doha announced a return to negotiations over a hostage deal — in contrast to the refusal they had maintained until that moment," Katz said. But another possibility is that Hamas agreed to restart the talks following a visit from US President DonaldTrump to the Middle East. "Following discussions between Qatar and the US during President Trump's visit to Doha, there is a renewed push by mediators from the United States, Qatar and Egypt to see if a new ceasefire agreement can be reached," an official with knowledge of the talks told CNN. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been in close contact with the negotiation team in Doha as well as Israel's Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and the US' Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in an effort to advance the deal, an Israeli official told CNN on Saturday. He instructed his negotiating team to remain in Doha "to fully exhaust all efforts to secure the release of our hostages," the official added. Last week Netanyahu directed the Israeli negotiating team to head to Qatar for talks, but made clear that he is only committed to negotiating a proposal put forward by Witkoff, which would see the release of half the hostages in return for a temporary ceasefire. The proposal does not guarantee an end to the war. Trump was in Doha Wednesday as part of a Middle East trip that skipped Israel. Trump said last week that he wanted an end to the "brutal war" in Gaza. He also bypassed Israel twice this month in reaching bilateral deals with regional militant groups. Hamas released an Israeli-American hostagelast week, and theHouthis agreedto stop firing at American ships in the Red Sea while pledging to continue fighting Israel. On Wednesday, Trump denied that Israel had been sidelined. "This is good for Israel," he said. But on Thursday, he said he wanted the US to "take" Gaza and turn it into a "freedom zone." "I have concepts for Gaza that I think are very good, make it a freedom zone, let the United States get involved and make it just a freedom zone," Trump said in Qatar. While in the Gulf, Trump also acknowledged that people are starving in Gaza and said the US would have the situation in Gaza "taken care of." Meanwhile, the UN and prominent aid organizations are raising the alarm over Israel's new offensive in Gaza, who say civilians who are bearing the brunt of the assault. The Israeli military said the operation is to "achieve all the goals of the war in Gaza, including the release of the hostages and the defeat of Hamas." More than 100 people have been killed in fresh airstrikes overnight, the Palestinian health ministry said Sunday, with entire families together. In the Al-Mawasi area of southern Gaza, an infant, his two young siblings and their parents, who were all living in a displacement camp, were killed on Saturday, Dr. Munir al-Barsh, the health ministry's director, told CNN. As the bombardment continues and the death toll rises, Gaza's healthcare system is being pushed further to the brink. On Sunday, the ministry of health said that "all public hospitals in the northern Gaza Strip are now out of service." The UN is now warning that over 2.1 million people – the enclave's entire population – is facing a risk of famine, following 19 months of conflict and mass displacement, now exacerbated by Israel's 11-week blocking of aid. On Friday, UN human rights chief Volker Turk said in a statement that the renewed bombing campaign was equivalent to ethnic cleansing. "This latest barrage of bombs … and the denial of humanitarian assistance underline that there appears to be a push for a permanent demographic shift in Gaza that is in defiance of international law and is tantamount to ethnic cleansing," Turk said. Despite the resumption of talks in Qatar, Omar Qandil, whose brother, sister-in-law and 4-month-old niece were killed in an overnight airstrike in central Gaza, said he feels the world has turned a blind eye to their suffering. "They were all asleep…all targeted in their bedroom," he said. "I don't know what we (can) say anymore, we (have) spoke a lot. There is no one looking at us: not Arabs not Muslims, no one." CNN's Eyad Kourdi, Abeer Salman and Eugenia Yosef contributed reporting. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Mediators make fresh push for peace in Gaza as death toll spikes from new Israeli campaign

Mediators make fresh push for peace in Gaza as death toll spikes from new Israeli campaign International mediators are making renewed effort...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com