Officials across US government scramble to implement Trump's surprise Syria announcementNew Foto - Officials across US government scramble to implement Trump's surprise Syria announcement

When President Donald Trump announced thelifting of US sanctions on Syriaduring his trip to the Middle East this week, it marked a major policy shift thatcould reshape the regionand triggered a scramble across the US government to implement the decision, according to three sources familiar with the matter. Trump administration officials had for months been carrying out quiet engagements to pave the way for sanctions relief and a potential high-level engagement with the former jihadist turned interim Syrian PresidentAhmed al-Sharaa, but the announcement sanctions would swiftly be removed altogether took some officials by surprise, according to the sources. "This was not an off-the-cuff decision by the president. The possibility had been discussed for months, but Trump barreled far beyond what was happening at the working level," said a source familiar with the discussions. The meeting would have been unimaginable until very recently. Syria had been engulfed by a brutal civil war that lasted more than a decade until al-Sharaa led forces that ousted Bashar al-Assad's brutal government in December. Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered some clarity on how the policy shift would work about 24 hours after Trump's remarks: the US would issue waivers to Syria sanctions, which are currently required by law. "If we make enough progress, we'd like to see the law repealed, because you're going to struggle to find people to invest in a country when any in six months, sanctions could come back. We're not there yet. That's premature," Rubio said. The administration is now engaged in a complicated technical review of the sanctions, which is expected to take weeks, officials said. There are no limits on the administration's authority to issue sanctions waivers, but the process will be time-consuming. A Trump administration official explained Thursday that Treasury "will likely issue general licenses covering a broad range of the economy that is critical to rebuilding in the coming weeks." Trump looked out into the crowd in Riyadh when he made his announcement on Tuesday and pointed to the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. "What I do for the crown prince," Trump said as he made eye contact with bin Salman. "The sanctions were brutal and crippling and served as an important, really, an important function nevertheless at the time, but now it's their time to shine. It's their time to shine." The moment crystallized the major role that Saudi officials have played behind the scenes on the topic for months, making the case that removing sanctions would boost the Syrian economy and help to stabilize the entire region. The Turkish government also had contacts with the US about Syria and knew about the work being done to see if the lifting of sanctions was possible, a source familiar with the matter said. The Turkish government expressed support for those efforts. Trump said he made the decision to lift sanctions after speaking with the Saudi crown prince and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. When Trump's major policy announcement came, both Turkey and Saudi Arabia were in the room. Bin Salman was there for the meeting with al-Sharaa and Erdogan joined virtually. But not all US allies in the region were in favor of where Trump was headed: Israel had opposed the move and Trump ignored their objections. An Israeli official told CNN that when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Trump in Washington in April, he asked the president not to remove sanctions on Syria, saying he feared it would lead to a repeat of the events of October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel. On Friday, Trump acknowledged "I didn't ask" Israel about the Syria sanctions relief. "I thought it was the right thing to do," he said as he wrapped up his tour of the Middle East. Trump's meeting with al-Sharaa came after administration officials had been meeting with Syrians in his government for months as they worked on building a relationship with the incoming team and explored sanctions relief. Syria's Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shaibani visited Washington for International Monetary Fund meetings in April where he had engagements with US officials with Syria's finance minister, which followed a meeting between US and Syria officials in New York, said three sources familiar with engagements. Both of those meetings drew on an initial engagement in March between US officials and al-Shaibani in Paris where the US laid out actions that would need to be taken to drive sanctions lifting, sources said. That framework included measures like cooperation on counterterrorism and work to destroy remaining chemical weapons. Representatives for Syria also met with individuals outside of the US government as part of their "charm offensive" to push for the lifting of sanctions, said Jonathan Schanzer, the executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank. Schanzer, who met with some of those representatives, said they sought to push the message that the new government is not the same as the Assad regime. But State Department officials also cautioned members of Congress against visiting Syria earlier this year, said a Syrian American source familiar with the conversations. "The State Department wanted to walk, not run, towards this outcome of working with al-Sharaa," the source said. As the steps were taken towards loosening sanctions and potentially working with al-Sharaa, two main figures have appeared to stand in opposition: the White House's head of counterterrorism, Sebastian Gorka, and Joel Rayburn, who served as Trump's Syria envoy during his first administration and has been nominated to head the Middle East portfolio for the State Department. "I think there was a desire to create some space for the new government, but I think Gorka and team were reluctant to 'normalize' Sharaa," said a former Trump administration official. "Once a jihadi, always a jihadi," was the feeling from Gorka, the former official said. That sentiment was on display Thursday when Gorka said in an interview with Politico: "The fact remains: jihadis very rarely moderate after they win." He called the president's meeting and message with al-Sharaa "absolute genius," but emphasized the need for inclusion of minority groups in government and the combatting ISIS that the US expects of al-Sharaa. "Now we will see whether the current acting head of state can deliver," Gorka said skeptically, calling al-Sharaa by the nom-de-guerre he used as a jihadist fighter, "Jolani," and calling his administration a "regime." Late last year, Rayburn also doubted that the world would support al-Sharaa as Syria's new leader given his jihadist past, but during his confirmation hearing in the Senate on Thursday, he repeatedly promised to enact Trump and Rubio's policies on Syria. In a pointed question for Rayburn, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, asked about "rumors" of discussions about the possible assassination of al-Sharaa. The concerns over the impact of al-Sharaa being killed was significant enough for Jordan's King Abdullah to raise the issue when he met with senators on Capitol Hill earlier this month, Shaheen said. "One of the things that was pointed out to us by King Abdullah was that a change in leadership of that kind would create an all-out civil war in Syria," Shaheen said. "I'm not familiar with efforts like that," Rayburn responded, "but I think that's clearly not in line with the president's intention that he stated or his description of Mr. Sharaa in the past couple days." As the Trump administration now barrels towards implementing the new policy, experts and groups supporting Syrian civil society say that the complexities are endless. Some are making the case that lifting US export controls on Syria in order to allow US shipments into the country will be critical in addition to the sanctions relief for Syria to begin building its economy. It is unclear if the interim Syrian government has agreed to all of the US demands, which came before Trump's announcement. Rubio said this week, however, that the al-Sharaa government had suggested they are committed to the principles outlined by the international community – inclusive government, peace with their neighbors including Israel, and driving out terrorists. He also said that Syria would make efforts to rid the country of chemical weapons with assistance from the US. But Rubio also cautioned that driving towards a normalized relationship with the al-Sharaa government would not happen overnight. "This is a new relationship. We've now known each other and known them for 24 hours," Rubio told reporters. "Obviously, we want to see progress made, and we'll take every step that they take, and it'll be a long road, because it's been a long time, so we recognize that, but this is a historic opportunity, and if it succeeds, we have a dramatic transformative effect on the region," he said. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Officials across US government scramble to implement Trump’s surprise Syria announcement

Officials across US government scramble to implement Trump's surprise Syria announcement When President Donald Trump announced theliftin...
Trump is digging up old immigration policies to help his crackdown. Here's a timeline for how we got hereNew Foto - Trump is digging up old immigration policies to help his crackdown. Here's a timeline for how we got here

President Donald Trump wasted no time enacting his immigration crackdown after being inaugurated for a second term. On the campaign trail, he promised mass deportations and more arrests — and to do it, he's resurrecting old policies. Immigration policy being at the forefront of politics is nothing new. From the nation's founding to modern day, the policies enacted over time reveal shifting priorities — from establishing the first basis of what it takes to immigrate to the US, to regulating the flow of arrivals, to addressing national security concerns in the wake of wars and 9/11. Members of the Trump administration are "very, very familiar with our immigration laws throughout the country's history and (are) looking back to see what provision they might use to achieve their current policies on immigration," said Julia Gelatt, the associate director of the US Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute. But, according to a recentCNN poll conducted by SSRS, about 52% of Americans say Trump hasgone too farin deporting undocumented immigrants and 57% say they do not believe the federal government is being careful in following the law while carrying out deportations. In fact, while weighing the issue before the election, some young voterstold CNNcurrent laws don't keep up with the times and they wanted to see bipartisan reform. The problem: accomplishing a comprehensive overhaul of the system is no easy task in an increasingly divided political climate. Here's a look at how we got here: The first Congress passedthe first naturalization act. It ratified the recently written Constitution, granting the power to establish a "uniform Rule of Naturalization" for "free white person" who lived in the United States for at least two years. TheAlien Enemies Actgave the government the authority todetain and deportpeople who were not US citizens and deemed a threat during wartime, plus allowed the government tobypass some of the protocolsin the immigration statutes. It was part of four laws, collectively known as theAlien and Sedition Acts, that were passed when the US was on the verge on conflict with France. It could be invoked by a president if the US was at war with another country, or if a foreign nation or government invaded, or threatened to invade, the US. TheSedition actalso permitted deportations of anyone who was deemed a threat or who published false writing against the US. Ratified by the states in 1868, the14th Amendmentgranted citizenship to all people"born or naturalized in the United States,"including Black Americans and former slaves, according to the Constitution. Large numbers ofChinese immigrantsbegan arriving during the California Gold Rush. The mass migration of speculators swelled California's population to more than quadruple in size in about a decade's time,growing to more than 370,000people by 1860. So, wheneconomic panicensued in the US in the 1870s, White citizens scapegoated Chinese immigrants for taking away jobs. Signed into law by President Chester Arthur, theChinese Exclusion Actwasthe first and only federal lawto prevent a specific nationality of people from becoming US citizens. It blocked Chinese workers from coming legally to the country, and blocked Chinese immigrants who were already living here from becoming US citizens. The Library of Congresscalled itthe "first significant restriction on free immigration in U.S. history." TheImmigration Act of 1891gave the federal government authority over the immigration process, according to theUS Citizenship and Immigration Services(USCIS). Prior to this law, immigrants were required to be processed by individual states. Ellis Island opened to accommodate the federal government's new authority, according tothe National Park Service. Between its opening on January 1, 1892, and when it closed in 1954, Ellis Island received more than 12 million people, NPS said. The United States passed its strictest immigration law of its time, theImmigration Act of 1917— two months before the US entered World War I. The law restricted theimmigrationof many people from the Middle East and Asia — including modern-day India, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Southeast Asia and the Asian-Pacific islands. To keep these people out, the lawraised the tax imposed on most adult entrants. It also imposeda literacy test, requiring newcomers older than 16 years old to show basic reading comprehension in any language. Many of these provisions paved the way for another immigration policy in the future, theState Department's Office of the Historiansaid. Some context:With World War I in full swing, US lawmakers who drafted and passed the Immigration Act of 1917 characterized it as necessary for the country's security. TheOffice of the Historiansaid that "the uncertainty generated over national security" during the war made it possible for the act to be signed into law. But it didn't pass unopposed. President Woodrow Wilson vetoed it, arguing the law prevented good people from joining American society. Congress overrode the veto. TheEmergency Quota Act of 1921was the first time the US set a cap on the number of immigrants allowed into the country, according tothe Migration Policy Institute. The quota applied only to people coming from outside the Western Hemisphere, MPI said. Most people from Asia were still barred, per the Immigration Act of 1917. It came during a time of growing isolationism, immigration fears and increased global displacement during and after WWI, theNPS said. TheImmigration Act of 1924reflected desires to tamp down on overall immigration, "but also try to shift the origins of immigration back to the western and northern European origin," Gelatt said. The act lowered the quotas, according tothe Office of the Historian, and included people of British descent whose families lived in the US for a long time in the calculations. This meant more visas were available for people from the British Isles and Western Europe, the office said. Immigrants from Asia were still excluded, it said. Republican Sen. David Reed of Pennsylvania, one of the lead sponsors of the bill,wrote in The New York Timesthat year that the US would become "a more homogeneous nation." He wrote that excluding people from certain countries "implies no reflection upon the merit of the excluded peoples. It is merely a recognition of their fundamental dissimilarity from ourselves." "This was a period where eugenics was sort of cutting-edge science," Gelatt said. "There was a concern that these were lower quality people, basically, who were coming from eastern and southern Europe." During the Great Depression, federal and local authoritiesrounded up large numbersof Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans, forcing them to leave their homes on the Arizona, California and Texas borders andrelocate to Mexico. Many Americans at the timeblamed Mexican communitiesfor taking away jobs and public assistance resources. The USCIS notes many people also returned to Mexico voluntarily, but state and local officials often usedcoercive methods or threats. President Franklin D. Roosevelt created theImmigration and Naturalization Service (INS)during the Great Depression, unifying the federal government's immigration and naturalization responsibilities into one agency,according to the USCIS. In the wake of the USentering World War II,Roosevelt signed an executive order targeting Japanese-Americans to be put into"relocation centers"or "internment camps." As a result, approximately 120,000 Japanese-Americans were forced to evacuate their homes and leave their jobs to live in the camps that were surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards, conditions that arenow drawing comparisonsto modern-day detention facilities. The Chinese Exclusion Act and other related measures were repealed with theMagnuson Act of 1943, theLibrary of Congresssaid, establishing quotas for immigrants from China and making them eligible to receive citizenship. AState Department history notesthe move was "in the interests of aiding the morale of a wartime ally during World War II." TheImmigration and Nationality Act of 1952amended the 1924 measure and laid the foundation of modern immigration law, according tothe USCIS. It continued the national origins quota system but ended the exclusion of immigrants from Asia and got rid of laws that prevented Asian immigrants from receiving citizenship, theOffice of the Historian said. But caveats still made the law discriminatory in practice. For example, the law used race instead of nationality in its quotas of Asian countries, which only received 100 visas each year, the office said. Further, if an immigrant had at least one Asian parent, they counted toward the quota from the country of their ethnicity or against a general — also restrictive — quota for the so-called "Asia-Pacific Triangle." This applied regardless of where the immigrant was coming from and even if they were a citizen of another country, according to a policy brief from theImmigration Policy Centerand theOffice of the Historian. It also laid out legal framework todeport people in the US illegally,according to USCIS, and prioritized skilled workers and family reunification, which is still used today, the office said. In the early years of the Cold War, the debate around immigration was intertwined with the debate about foreign policy and national security. During deliberations about the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, some lawmakers wanted more liberal immigration laws, fearing that a restrictive quota system would lead to tension with other countries, theOffice of the Historianoutlined. However, other lawmakers were concerned about communism infiltrating the US, the office said. "Operation Wetback"was anaggressive and unprecedented sweepby US Border Patrol agents in the mid-1950s that plucked Mexican laborers from fields and ranches in targeted raids, bused them to detention centers along the border and ultimately sent many of them deep into the interior of Mexico, some by airlift, others on cargo boats that typically hauled bananas. During his first campaign in 2015, Trumpcited the operationas a model for how he would carry out mass deportations. More than 200,000 people fled Cuba in the span of three years after Fidel Castro's Cuban revolution. As a result, theCuban Refugee Program— established in 1961 — helped relocate hundreds of thousands of immigrants who arrived in Miami across the US during the next two decades, theLibrary of Congresssaid. TheMigration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962helped provide funding and resources for refugees who came to the United States, including resettling them in the US and providingaid through international organizations. It also allowed nearly 20,000 refugees into the country between 1960 and 1965, extending the terms of theFair Share Refugee Actwhich Congress passed in 1960, according toUSCIS. Parts of theImmigration and Nationality Act of 1965have made their way into modern immigration policy. The bill wasspearheaded by President John F. Kennedywho wanted immigration reform, specifically to get rid ofbans based on national origin,according to his letters to lawmakers. The law was ultimately signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, after Kennedy's assassination. It made several changes to immigration policy — but also several miscalculations that have had lasting consequences in which politics has since made it difficult to correct, experts said. The law abolished quotas, established a preference system prioritizing immigrants' skills and family reunification and opened the door to more non-European immigration. However, it still favored immigrants from western and northern Europe over eastern and southern Europe and had very low levels of permissible immigration from other countries — especially from Asian and African countries, Gelatt said. Notably, the law placed a cap on the number of available visas, but did not include the immediate relatives of someone who is already in the country as part of the count. During debates around the 1965 act, some members of Congress were worried that eliminating national origins quotas would shift the origins of immigrants away from Europe, Gelatt said. Their concerns were stated in "rather racist terms," she said. In fact, when Johnson signed the bill into law under the Statue of Liberty, he said itwasn't a "revolutionary bill"and told Americans it "wouldn't reshape the structure of our daily lives" but that it "corrects a cruel and enduring wrong in the conduct of the American Nation." By promoting immigration through family ties, the idea was that immigration would "replicate the racial and national origins of current residents of the United States," Gelatt said. That's not what happened in practice. There were enough other pathways into the country — including student or temporary visas, for example — for immigrants from other parts of the world to also sponsor their own family members, leading to "a very large increase in immigration from Latin America and from various Asian countries," Gelatt said. There was also an effect on illegal immigration. The new cap on the immigrants from the Western Hemisphere was lower than the number of people who wanted to come to the US, Gelatt said. That "served over time to shift some immigration flows" from happening "within the law, to causing those to happen outside of the law," especially from Mexico, she said. According todata compiled by the Migration Policy Institute, immigrants from the Americas became the largest portion of the total immigrant population from 1980 onward, a shift from a majority European-born population. President Jimmy Carter signed theRefugee Act of 1980as an amendment to the 1965 law to standardize the process of letting refugees into the US. The law provided the "first statutory basis for asylum," according to theUSCIS, and increased the number of refugees allowed in each year. Moving forward, the president and Congress also had the power to set how many refugees would be admitted annually,the law said. Six years later, President Ronald Reagan tried to address undocumented immigration with theImmigration Reform and Control Act of 1986which set up restrictions on employers. It made it illegal for people to knowingly hire undocumented immigrants and established an"employment verification system,"according to the bill. It also gave more money to the Border Patrol and other federal agencies. TheImmigration Act of 1990was the firstsignificant revision of immigration policysince the Immigration and Nationality Act and tried to address some of the 1965 law's pitfalls by creating more avenues for skilled and educated workers. It defined three categories of immigration, based on family, employment and diversity, theMPI said. It set a cap of 700,000 total immigrant visas for fiscal years 1992-1994, but still did not include the immediate family members of US citizens in that count. Notably, the 1990 law also set up five categories of employment visas, targeting skilled workers, according to the MPI, and used a lottery system to determine which H-1B petitions would proceed further. If that sounds familiar, it's because it is. "Most of the rules that we're operating under, in terms of legal immigration, were set in 1990," Gelatt said. Additionally, the 1990 law created Temporary Protected Status, which has been a big topic in immigration policy today, she said. TPS applies to people who wouldface extreme hardshipif forced to return to homelands devastated by armed conflict or natural disasters, therefore the protections arelimited to people already in the United States. Republican and Democratic administrations have designated the protections. The1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Actput in place measures that intensified the law enforcement focus of US immigration laws, Gelatt said. It expanded the number of immigrants with criminal convictions eligible to be deported, introduced expedited removal procedures andput restrictionson many unauthorized immigrants from legalizing though family relationships, she said. Terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, putting newemphasis on national security,border security and immigration. After the attacks, immigration was reframed as a "critical part of our national security infrastructure and so the emphasis on vetting and screening of immigrants just really increased," Gelatt said, adding that there has also been a focus on integrating government databases since then. TheHomeland Security Act of 2002overhauled the federal government's role in immigration in response to the 9/11 attacks and disbanded the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Among other national security functions, itcreated the Department of Homeland Security, noting a shift toward border security and counterterrorism. In 2003, the functions of the INS were put intothree new agencies within DHS— US Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Customs and Border Protection and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as outlined in the bill. TheSecure Fence Actunder President George W. Bush authorized construction of about 700 miles of barriers and surveillance along the US-Mexico border. In an effort to "make our borders more secure," Bush, at the time, called it an "important step toward immigration reform," according to aWhite House fact sheet. TheDeferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)was introduced by President Barack Obama. It allowed certain immigrants who were brought to the US as children to receive renewableprotection from deportationand be eligible for work permits, obtain drivers licenses and enroll in college. However, the program didn't give them a path to become US citizens or legal permanent residents — something immigrant rights advocates have criticized, saying it left people in limbo. When President Donald Trump took office for this first term, he took a series of controversial actions aimed at reducing illegal immigration and enhancing border security. Here are some of them: Travel ban:Trump issued an executive order aimed at restricting entry into the United States for citizens fromseveral predominantly Muslim countries. The order also suspended refugee admissions for four months and indefinitely halted refugees from Syria. After facing legal challenges, a revised version of the ban was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. Efforts to end DACA:Trump announced plans toend the program, but after a series of legal battles, theSupreme Court ruled in 2020that Trump's moves related to DACA weren't backed with an adequate reason to end the program. President Joe Biden later issued an executive order to preserve the program. End "catch-and-release":Trump announced the end to the practice ofreleasing undocumented immigrants, particularly families and asylum seekers, into the US while their court proceedings played out. The administration increased capacity at detention facilities and put in place stricter enforcement measures. Crackdown on sanctuary cities:Trump, through an executive order, tried to put pressure on sanctuary cities bystripping them of federal funding. These are cities, counties and states that seek to protect undocumented immigrants who come in contact with local law enforcement from deportation by federal authorities. Border wall:To fund construction of a border wall, Trump initially tried to get billions of dollars passed through Congress aspart of a funding bill. But a standoff with lawmakers led toa partial government shutdownat theend of 2018. In February 2019, Trump signed a compromise border security legislation to avoid another shutdown and also declareda national emergencyto use funds from the Department of Defense and other sources to fund the border wall project, which was met withCongressionalandlegalchallenges. Biden reversed many of Trump's immigration policies, including thetravel banand limits on asylum seekers. He alsostopped border wall constructionand established atask force for family reunification. Toward the end of his term, Biden spent a lot of time trying to defend his administration's immigration actions against Republican attacks. Biden often pointed to a comprehensive,bipartisan border dealthat failed in the Senate twice, at the direction of then-candidate Trump. Now more than 100 days into his second term, Trump has pushed legal boundaries in trying to enact his immigration promises — one of which was to complete "the largest domestic deportation operation in American history." To do it, Trump has invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 todeport Venezuelan migrantsto a prison in El Salvador. It has only been invoked three times in US history — all during war. The Supreme Court haspaused these deportations. Trump also signed an executive order declaring anational emergencyat the US southern border tobolster military presenceand send migrants toGuantanamo Bay, and has kicked off the process to end birthright citizenship, which was met withlegal challenges. The administration has also terminated hundreds of students' visas under a rarely usedprovisionthat allows for revocation if a person's presence in the US "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States." The administration has said the students are sympathizing with Hamas. Some of the students challenged the move in court, but the government laterbacked downin the legal fight. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump is digging up old immigration policies to help his crackdown. Here’s a timeline for how we got here

Trump is digging up old immigration policies to help his crackdown. Here's a timeline for how we got here President Donald Trump wasted ...
Tornadoes tear through Kentucky, Missouri; at least 21 deadNew Foto - Tornadoes tear through Kentucky, Missouri; at least 21 dead

At least 21 people were killed in Kentucky and Missouri afterstorms and reported tornadoes tore through the regionas part of an extreme weather outbreak on May 16, "leaving behind a trail of destruction," authorities said. The toll includes at least 14 dead in Kentucky, according toGov. Andy Beshear, and seven in Missouri, authorities there said. "Our city is grieving tonight," St. Louis, Missouri, Mayor Cara Spencer said in a news conference on May 16 when she announced five people died in the city. The tornadoes came amid a severe weather outbreak with preliminary reports of tornadoes in Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky and even New Jersey. The tornado in St. Louis downed trees and ripped entire walls off of homes, photos of the destruction showed. About 130 miles away in Scott County, Missouri, the sheriff's office said two more were killed in a tornado that tore through rural areas there. "The tornado moved from the eastern part of the county, leaving behind a trail of destruction, with multiple homes completely lost and areas left unrecognizable," Sheriff Derick Wheetley said in astatement. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Tornado outbreak kills several in Kentucky, Missouri

Tornadoes tear through Kentucky, Missouri; at least 21 dead

Tornadoes tear through Kentucky, Missouri; at least 21 dead At least 21 people were killed in Kentucky and Missouri afterstorms and reported...
Colombia seeks to join China-based development bank as Latin America drifts away from WashingtonNew Foto - Colombia seeks to join China-based development bank as Latin America drifts away from Washington

MIAMI (AP) — Colombia's government has applied to join a China-based development bank, another sign ofLatin America's drift away from the U.S.as theTrumpadministration's foreign aid cuts, trade barriers and crackdown on immigration spurs many leaders in the region to seek closer ties withWashington's geopolitical rival. Colombian PresidentGustavo Petrowrapped up a visit to China this week with a stop in Shanghai, where he met with former Brazilian PresidentDilma Rousseff, the head of the New Development Bank. Themultilateral lenderwas set up a decade ago as a project of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — the so-calledBRICS nationsof major developing markets — as a counter to U.S.-dominated institutions like theWorld Bankand Inter-American Development Bank. To date, the New Development Bank has approved loans for 122 infrastructure projects totaling more than $40 billion in areas such as transport, sanitation and clean energy, according to Rousseff. Petro, speaking to reporters in China on Saturday, said that Colombia is committed to purchasing $512 million worth of shares in the bank. He said t hat he was especially excited by the possibility of securing the New Development Bank's support for a 120-kilometer (75-mile) canal, or railway, connecting Colombia's Atlantic and Pacific Ocean coastlines that he said would position the country at the "heart" of trade between South America and Asia. Colombia is the second Latin American country to try and join the bank after tiny Uruguay sought membership in 2021. But Colombia's traditional role as a staunch U.S. ally and caretaker inthe war on drugsis likely to raise eyebrows in Washington. The U.S. State Department this week said that it would "vigorously oppose" financing of projects linked toChina's Belt and Road Initiativein Latin America following Petro's show of support for the strategy at a summit with fellow leftist leaders from Brazil and China. Petro, a former leftist guerrilla, said he wouldn't be dissuaded by U.S. pressure and reaffirmed that Colombia seeks to remain neutral in a new era of geopolitical wrangling. "We made this decision freely," Petro told reporters from Shanghai. "With the United States we can speak face to face, with China too."

Colombia seeks to join China-based development bank as Latin America drifts away from Washington

Colombia seeks to join China-based development bank as Latin America drifts away from Washington MIAMI (AP) — Colombia's government has ...
DAN GAINOR: Journalism's original spin. 7 ways the Tapper/Thompson Biden book attempts to absolve mediaNew Foto - DAN GAINOR: Journalism's original spin. 7 ways the Tapper/Thompson Biden book attempts to absolve media

Journalism is the first draft of history, to paraphrase a famous quote. If that's true, journalism books are the CYA of history. Such is the case with the new book by CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios National Political Correspondent Alex Thompson, who try to shift the blame for coverage of PresidentJoe Biden'shealth entirely onto the White House and away from the biased news media – like CNN. The duo is about to release their book titled, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run." The book would be better titled, "Original Spin." Based on early release to various news outlets, it is a whitewash of journalism's many failures to properly cover Biden's very public slide into incoherence. If Helen of Troy was The Face That Launched a Thousand Ships, this book launched 1,000 takes onTwitter/X, some of them so good they should win awards. (Stephen L. Miller, aka @redsteeze, outdid them all.) Journalism's 'Original Spin': How Tapper's Biden Book Attempts To Absolve Media But it wasn't just Tapper, it was an entire media enterprise that hid Biden's decline. Here are my seven favorite moments from then and now: The Amazon description reads like it's promoting "All the President's Men," not a book-long rationalization. "From two of America's most respected journalists, an unflinching and explosive reckoning with one of the most fateful decisions in American political history: Joe Biden's run for reelection despite evidence of his serious decline—amid desperate efforts to hide the extent of that deterioration." And it then includes this quote from the equally culpable folks at Politico: "The book Biden allies fear the most." Read On The Fox News App Biden allies don't fear the book. There aren't many left who admit they supported him. It's the media who fear it. Because this book reminds Americans the legacy press is untrustworthy either covering the news or admitting their role in covering it up. We're not letting Tapper off that easy. Here's his ego-infused PR quote in a CNN story, "Toni Morrison once said 'If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it,'" Jake Tapper said in a statement. "That's what inspired this book: we wanted to know more about what we all just lived through. More than 200 interviews later, Alex and I have a much better idea. And soon you all will too." Axios Reporter Pushes Back On Biden's Denial Of Mental Decline, Saying White House Insiders Disagree To hear Tapper and tell it, they are hard-working truth tellers in a world beset by dishonest politicians. This is the same CNN anchor who repeatedly both covered for and covered up Biden's mental failings. And he wants a get-out-of-jail-free-card for admitting Biden isn't mentally fit to run a hotdog stand. Or eat at one. On February 8, 2024, Biden held a press conference to counter special counsel Robert Hur's claim Biden was, "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." The presser was epic, with the president pretending his memory was "fine." Then he called Egyptian President Abdel Fatah El-Sisi the"president of Mexico"during a presser where he spoke slowly and seemed to lose his train of thought. (Days before, he claimed he had spoken with adead French leader.) The media coverage was laughable. The New York Times ran with, "'My Memory Is Fine,' a Defiant Biden Declares After Special Counsel Report." The Post chose, "Biden responds angrily to special counsel report questioning his memory." Legacy media outlets skipped the embarrassing memory lapse in headlines. Tapper wasn't alone running cover for Biden. There was "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough, who delivered the most-embarrassing quote of the entire 2024 election: "I've said it for years now, he's cogent. But I undersold it when I said he was cogent, he's far beyond cogent. In fact, I think he's better than he's ever been, intellectually, analytically, because he's been around for fifty-years," Scarborough said. "Start your tape right now because I'm about to tell you the truth. And f--- you if you can't handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best Biden ever." That was March 6, 2024. Biden's campaign ended slightly more than four months later. There was no medical event. No rapid decline. And this came after the disastrous press conference. When journalists didn't like what people were saying about the president, they pretended it was based on phony videos. CNN's Brian Stelter ran with the White House's argument. "The White House used the phrase 'cheap fakes," adding, "let me explain what that is." Now, we have Tapper saying that Biden didn't even recognize actor George Clooney. In June 2024, NBC News' Gabe Gutierrez did a 'well ackually' segment that argued Biden hadn't wandered away from foreign leaders. "In reality, another camera angle showed the president was actually trying to greet skydivers." He also said the right was "falsely claiming the president was meandering." Just like the right falsely claimed a White Housestaffer in an Easter Bunny outfitpulled the president away from press questions. As part of the book's PR blitz, Tapper and Thompson co-authored a piece in The New Yorker, titled, "How Joe Biden Handed the Presidency to Donald Trump." Four paragraphs in, they quote Democrats who agree with their narrative. "'We got so screwed by Biden, as a party,'David Plouffe,who helped run the Harris campaign, told us," they claimed. And one paragraph later, "Plouffe added, 'He totally f---ed us.'" The article goes on to credit actorGeorge Clooneyfor writing an op-ed calling Biden to step down. The actor had attended a Biden fundraiser in June and the article gave an exchange where, "It seemed clear that the President had not recognized Clooney." But Clooney is Tapper's hero here. Not the legions of conservatives who complained about Biden's failing health long before. The Clooney name gets mentioned 59 times in the piece. Fifty-nine. That's five more times than Clooney has appeared in movies, according to IMDB.com. Even after Biden's debate with Donald Trump, two New York Times writers wouldn't give in. Lydia Polgreen wrote: "No one won this debate, but there is no question who lost: anyone who plans to cast a ballot for president in November." Jamelle Bouie agreed, "Well, we had a raspy and stumbling President Biden and a deranged and incoherent Donald Trump, who spent two hours unleashing a stream of lies. Is there a winner here? Nah." AP delivered one of the greatest understatements in history: "Debate-watchers in the Biden and Trump camps seem to agree on something: Biden had a bad night." Click Here To Read More From Dan Gainor Original article source:DAN GAINOR: Journalism's original spin. 7 ways the Tapper/Thompson Biden book attempts to absolve media

DAN GAINOR: Journalism's original spin. 7 ways the Tapper/Thompson Biden book attempts to absolve media

DAN GAINOR: Journalism's original spin. 7 ways the Tapper/Thompson Biden book attempts to absolve media Journalism is the first draft of...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com