Audio of interview confirms Biden memory lapsesNew Foto - Audio of interview confirms Biden memory lapses

Newly released audio of a special counsel interviewing then-President joe Biden confirms memory lapses that White House officials denied at the time, including a president clearly struggling to remember the year his oldest son died. Even after the transcript was released, Biden aides, including then-White House spokesman Ian Sams,insistedthat the president did not forget the year that his son Beau died of brain cancer. The audio shows that Biden struggled to remember the year and had to be prompted by his lawyers, who were sitting in the interview with him. The recording of the interview wasfirst released by Axios. Sams did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The audio of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur is likely to fuel a growing debate among Democrats and others about whether there was a concerted effort to cover up the president's diminished mental capacity, as well as whether that contributed to the party's 2024 defeat at the polls. It also comes as several new books offer insight into what many behind the scenes knew. Biden sat for more than five hours of interviews over two days in October 2023 as part of Hur's investigation into Biden's retention of classified documents at his home and office from his time as vice president. Hur later cited interviews in which he described Biden as an "elderly man with a poor memory" in his final report at the end of his investigation. Donald Trump and his Republican allies seized on Hur's description of Biden and demanded the audio of his interviews be released. Then-Attorney General Merrick Garland released the transcript of Biden's interviews, but not the audio. Garland said at the time that the audio was covered by executive privilege, and the White House did not want it released. Republicans held Garland in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over the audio. News organizations, including NBC News, filed a lawsuit seeking any recordings of Biden's interviews, and the issue was not resolved before Biden left office. About a month after Trump took office, the Justice Department asked the court for more time to consider the issue because the new administration's "leadership is still in the process of being installed" in the department, according to a court filing. The judge agreed to an extension and ordered Justice Department attorneys to file an update on the status of the case by May 20. Hur, who was tapped by Garland to conduct a criminal investigation after classified documents were found in Biden's home and office, concluded there was evidence that Biden willfully retained classified information — a felony. But Hur said he did not believe he could win a conviction, in part because of Biden's faltering memory. "We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," Hur wrote in his report. Biden's lawyers at the time aggressively pushed back on that description, arguing that he performed well in a difficult interview and suffered the same sorts of memory lapses that witnesses often do. Biden's aides and senior Democrats excoriated Hur for including such a description in a report where no charges were brought. Months later, Hur's assessment of Biden was validated by his disastrous performance during a debate with Trump. Biden struggled to complete thoughts and sentences throughout the debate, which led to his exit from the 2024 race weeks later.

Audio of interview confirms Biden memory lapses

Audio of interview confirms Biden memory lapses Newly released audio of a special counsel interviewing then-President joe Biden confirms mem...
Moody's downgrades United States credit rating on increase in government debtNew Foto - Moody's downgrades United States credit rating on increase in government debt

Moody's Ratings slashed the United States' credit rating down a notch toAa1 from the highest triple A on Friday, citing the budgetary burden the government faces amid high interest rates. "This one-notch downgrade on our 21-notch rating scale reflects the increase over more than a decade in government debt and interest payment ratios to levels that are significantly higher than similarly rated sovereigns," the ratings agency said in a statement. The U.S. is running a massive budget deficit as interest costs for Treasury debt continued to rise due to a combination of higher rates and more debt to finance. The fiscal deficit totaled $1.05 trillion year to date, 13% higher than a year ago. The influx in tariffs helped shave some of the imbalance last month, however. Moody's had been a holdout in keeping U.S. sovereign debt at the highest credit rating possible, and brings the 116-year-old agency into line with its rivals. Standard & Poor's downgraded the U.S. to AA+ from AAA in August 2011, and Fitch Ratings also cut the U.S. rating to AA+ from AAA, in August 2023. The news came as the GOP-led House Budget Committee on Friday rejected a sweeping package for President Donald Trump's agenda that includes extending the 2017 tax cuts. "Successive US administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs," Moody's said. "We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration." Moody's officially rated U.S. bonds in 1993 for the first time, but it had assigned a "country ceiling rating" of AAA on the U.S. since 1949. The benchmark10-year Treasury yieldshot 3 basis points higher in after-hours trading, trading at 4.48%. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF fell about 1% in extended trading, while the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust fell 0.4%. "Treasurys are still dealing with the fundamental factor of less foreign demand for them and the growing size of the pile of debt that needs to be constantly refinanced is not going to change, but it is symbolic in the sense that here's a major rating agency that's calling the out that the U.S. has strained debts and deficits," said Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Financial Group. In reaction to Trump's trade battle last month, Treasury yields rose and the dollar weakened against its global counterparts in a sign that investors could be moving away from the U.S. as the safest place to invest. Novo Nordisk CEO to step down as Wegovy maker faces growing competition Musk's xAI says Grok's 'white genocide' posts resulted from change that violated 'core values' How House GOP bill's $4,000 senior 'bonus' compares to eliminating tax on Social Security benefits

Moody's downgrades United States credit rating on increase in government debt

Moody's downgrades United States credit rating on increase in government debt Moody's Ratings slashed the United States' credit ...
DHS considers reality show pitting immigrants against one another for citizenshipNew Foto - DHS considers reality show pitting immigrants against one another for citizenship

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security is considering collaborating on a TV show with the producer of thepopular reality show "Duck Dynasty"that would pit immigrants against each other in a contest to – potentially – get their U.S. citizenship applications fast-tracked, a department official confirmed May 16. DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin initially denied that the idea,first reported by the DailyMail.Com, was being considered by DHS or Department ofHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. "This is completely false. Daily Mail's 'reporting' is an affront to journalism. Secretary Noem has not 'backed' nor is even aware of the pitch of any scripted or reality show," McLaughlin said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY. In its May 16 report, the UK publication said "the idea is for real and is outlined in a 35-page program pitch put together in coordination with the DHS secretary" and Rob Worsoff, a writer and producer known for the popular A&E reality show aboutthe Robertson family of Louisianaand its hunting empire. McLaughlin said DHS receives "hundreds of television show pitches a year," including documentaries involving border operations by its Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection branches and white collar investigations by its Homeland Security Investigations branch. "Each proposal undergoes a thorough vetting process prior to denial or approval," McLaughlin said. "This pitch has not received approval or rejection by staff." But McLaughlin lateracknowledged to other media outletsthat the proposal is "in the very beginning stages of that vetting process." The proposed series is called "The American," named after the train that contestants would ride around the country, competing in regionally specific "cultural" contests, such as logrolling in Wisconsin, the DailyMail.com reported. It said it would end in a grand finale with the winner getting sworn in as a citizen on the steps of the U.S. Capitol. "Along the way, we will be reminded what it means to be American – through the eyes of the people who want it most," according to Worsoff's pitch, the article said. "I'm not affiliated with any political ideology. As an immigrant myself, I am merely trying to make a show that celebrates the immigration process, celebrate what it means to be American and have a national conversation about what it means to be American, through the eyes of the people who want it most," Worsoff told DailyMail.com. The Daily Mail also quoted McLaughlin, a Trump appointee under Noem as an assistant DHS secretary, as being totally supportive. "I think it's a good idea," it quoted McLaughlin as saying. McLaughlin told the Daily Mail that agency staff had a call with the producer last week but that Noem had yet to be briefed about it. "However, DailyMail.com has confirmed that Noem supports the project and wants to proceed," the media outlet said, adding that Noem "is wanting to showcase what it means to become an American, amid the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration." In January,A&E announced the reboot of the original hit showin a press release, saying the show would follow the Robertson family as "they grapple with mapping out the future of Duck Commander, watching the kids navigate marriage, children and businesses of their own, and passing down the family legacy." If the proposed new show gets a green light at DHS and in Hollywood, the contestants would be immigrants already in the system, who would compete in various contests, including potentially on American history and science,Worsoff told the Wall Street Journal. He said that losing contestants, though, would not face deportation. "This isn't 'The Hunger Games' for immigrants," Worsoff said. "This is not, 'Hey, if you lose, we are shipping you out on a boat out of the country.'" This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:DHS considers TV reality show where immigrants vy for citizenship

DHS considers reality show pitting immigrants against one another for citizenship

DHS considers reality show pitting immigrants against one another for citizenship WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security is consid...
Trump attorneys draw judge's ire by saying 'state secrets' keep them from sharing details on Abrego Garcia's returnNew Foto - Trump attorneys draw judge's ire by saying 'state secrets' keep them from sharing details on Abrego Garcia's return

GREENBELT, Maryland — In a contentious court hearing on Friday, Trump administration attorneys argued before a federal judge in Maryland that they should be allowed to withhold information regarding efforts to facilitate the return of a Salvadoran man to the United States. Kilmar Abrego Garcia remains in the Salvadoran prison system despite orders from a federal judge and Supreme Court calling for the government to facilitate his return to the United States. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis said the government's refusal to provide certain information in the case has been "an exercise in utter frustration." In a back and forth that has continued for weeks, Xinis has ordered the administration to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release and provide documentation on what steps it has taken, if any, to comply with that order. Government lawyers said the administration has not been able to answer questions about Abrego Garcia's case because that information would be considered protected under "state secrets" or "deliberative process" privileges that should not be shared with the public. On Friday, Xinis said the administration has not made a good faith effort to comply with the court order. She repeatedly called on the administration to show how turning over evidence of actions it has taken or will take to return Abrego Garcia would pose a reasonable danger to foreign affairs. "There is simply no detail. This is basically, 'take my word for it,'" the judge said. Attorney Jonathan Guynn said the government believes it has complied with the judge's order and provided its argument for why certain details should not appear in court documents and testimony. The government has argued that revealing additional information could compromise state secrets or foreign relations. The attorney also provided an update on Abrego Garcia, saying that he was in good health and in a prison in Santa Ana in El Salvador where he was moved after spending a few weeks in thesupermax mega-prisonto which he was first deported. Abrego Garciawas living in Maryland with his wife and three children when he was arrested by immigration agents and deported to El Salvador in March.The Trump administrationhas accused him of being a member of the Salvadoran MS-13 gang andused that in its justificationfor deporting him to his home country — despite a judge's order from 2019 barring him from being sent there. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia have argued that the Trump administration has been "stonewalling" the court. "We're not even allowed to pose those basic questions at depositions without running into the roadblock of state secrets," attorney Andrew Rossman told the court on Friday. Abrego Garcia's team said the discovery they've received from the government thus far has been inadequate, and Xinis appeared to agree. The plaintiffs said they received 164 documents, and 132 of them were photocopies of court filings and their own discovery requests. Rossman said that of the remaining 32 new documents, half were related to Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen's recent trip to El Salvador to see Abrego Garcia. Rossman said the government logged 1,140 documents as "privileged," in "every manner of privilege that I've ever heard of." "My head is spinning, your honor," he said. Rossman also said it was "deeply disturbing" that while the administration has claimed in court that it's complying with the order to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release, high-ranking officials including Trump himself have contradicted that in public. The administration's claims, Xinis says, have been hampering efforts to get to the bottom of whether the government has disobeyed the court order by not facilitating the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States. Over the past several days, there have been almost a dozen sealed filings on the case docket, with Abrego Garcia's legal team seeking specific documents and information, and the government arguing it cannot reveal certain information, even to the judge in some cases. "Nearly all the additional materials Plaintiffs demand are protected by the state secrets and deliberative process privileges and so cannot be produced," U.S. attorneys wrote in a brief on Monday. Among the sealed materials are copies of the deposition transcripts of three government witnesses. Abrego Garcia's lawyers told the court that the three officials were instructed by the Department of Justice to decline to answer certain questions on the basis of the "state secret" or "deliberative process" privileges, or both. Xinis has asked the government for the legal and factual reasons for invoking those privileges. She also took issue with the number of documents being sealed in this case. The court hearing continued behind closed doors on Friday. Xinis indicated she would soon issue an order on the matter.

Trump attorneys draw judge's ire by saying 'state secrets' keep them from sharing details on Abrego Garcia's return

Trump attorneys draw judge's ire by saying 'state secrets' keep them from sharing details on Abrego Garcia's return GREENBEL...
DHS asks for 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration roundups, Pentagon reviewing requestNew Foto - DHS asks for 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration roundups, Pentagon reviewing request

WASHINGTON (AP) —https://apnews.com/article/space-force-national-guard-governors-6fd8f57072559133da0f611543f0f047The Department of Homeland Security has asked for 20,000 National Guard troops to assist withimmigration roundupsacross the country, and the Pentagon is reviewing the unusual request, a U.S. official confirmed to The Associated Press. DHS asked for the troops to help carry outPresident Donald Trump's "mandate from the American people to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens," department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said. She said DHS will "use every tool and resource available" to do so because the "safety of American citizens comes first." Unlike thetroops deployed at the southern border, these National Guard units would come from the states and be used to assist in deportation operations in the interior of the country. How the troops would be used may depend on whether theyremain under state governors' control. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, troops under federal orders cannot be used for domestic law enforcement, but units under state control can. The addition of 20,000 National Guard troops would provide a huge boost to immigration enforcement. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the DHS agency responsible for immigration enforcement in the interior of the country, has a total staff of about 20,000 people spread across three divisions. Enforcement and Removals Operations, which is the division directly responsible for arresting and removing people who do not have the right to stay in the country, has a total staff of roughly 7,700 people, including a little over 6,000 law enforcement officers. It was unclear why the request was made to the Defense Department and not to the states. The U.S. official spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details not yet made public. Trump has been carrying out awide-ranging crackdownon illegal immigration, issuing a series ofexecutive ordersdesigned to stop what he has called the "invasion" of the United States. The U.S. already has as many as 10,000 troops under state and federal orders along the U.S.-Mexico border, including some who are now empowered to detain migrants they encounter along anewly militarized narrow strip of landadjacent to the border. So far, these troops have largely been limited to providing airlift, bolstering the wall, surveillance and administrative support to free up border agents for arrests or detentions. Along the newly militarized zone, troops have put up warning signs and accompanied border agents but left the detention of migrants crossing the border to other agencies. In New Mexico, where the new militarized zone was first created, federal magistrate judges havestarted dismissingnational security charges against migrants accused of crossing the southern U.S. border through the newly designated military zone, finding little evidence that they were aware of the zone. The request for 20,000 troops was first reported by The New York Times. ___

DHS asks for 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration roundups, Pentagon reviewing request

DHS asks for 20,000 National Guard troops for immigration roundups, Pentagon reviewing request WASHINGTON (AP) —https://apnews.com/article/s...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com