'I feel very scared': Some Americans fear losing coverage due to proposed Medicaid cutsNew Foto - 'I feel very scared': Some Americans fear losing coverage due to proposed Medicaid cuts

Key components of the bill to fund President Donald Trump's agenda looks to provide major tax breaks by cutting spending elsewhere, includingmassive cuts to Medicaid. Medicaid is a joint federal and state health insurance program for disabled and low-income Americans. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) works with state programs to administer Medicaid, under which more than71.2 million peopleare enrolled. Medicaid offers benefits including nursing home care, personal care services and assistance paying for premiums and other costs, according to CMS. MORE: 'What a joke': Republicans lock horns over Medicaid proposal Ananalysisfrom the Congressional Budget Office estimates cuts to Medicaid could increase the number of people without health insurance by at least 8.6 million by 2034. "Medicaid is an important safety net for so many Americans," Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, president of the American Nurse Association, told ABC News. "When we look at the most vulnerable and most underserved, it's going to impact these groups disproportionately." Many Republicans have insisted that cuts to Medicaid are only to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse and will not result in lost coverage for those who need it, which wasrepeated during testimonythis week by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But some Americans who rely on Medicaid for their own coverage, or coverage for their families, told ABC News they're worried that cuts could reduce their ability to receive health care, or force them to choose between paying for coverage or paying for necessities. Rosa Andresen, from Southgate, California, has been her 27-year-old daughter's caregiver for the past 13 years. Her daughter, Amanda, is disabled and has conditions including cerebral palsy and a seizure disorder. Over a decade ago, Andresen left her job at a data entry retrieval company to care for her daughter full time. Andresen, 54, said Amanda is covered by Medicare and Medicaid, which has helped pay for diapers, seizure medication and mobility tools such as a shower chair and a ramp to help her go up and down stairs. It's unclear if Amanda would lose Medicaid coverage under the new proposal but, if she did, it would be a massive blow to her care, Andresen said. "It's very devastating," Andresen told ABC News. "I'm very, very sad, and I feel very scared for my daughter's well-being. It could drastically affect her health and her life, the quality of life that she has." MORE: The GOP is trying again to cut Medicaid. It's only gotten harder since 2017 Andresen said she is scared that she will receive a letter in the mail telling her that her daughter is no longer eligible for Medicaid or she'll take Amanda to a doctor's appointment and find out that her daughter cannot receive care there or can no longer be prescribed a certain medication. She said she has tried to see if she could get private insurance for her daughter, such as through her husband's job, but insurance companies allegedly told her they don't cover people with chronic illnesses. According to theHHS, "health insurers can no longer charge more or deny coverage to you or your child because of a pre-existing health condition like asthma, diabetes, or cancer, as well as pregnancy". While California does have Medi-Cal, which is the state's implementation of the federal Medicaid program, Andresen said she doesn't know what the program would cover and what she would have to pay out of pocket. "I use government assistance to buy food, like the [electronic benefit transfer], to put food at my table and if I have to also use money out of my pocket, I don't know if I'm going to be able to make it if I [have to] decide to buy my daughter's medication or put food on the table," Andresen said. Four years ago, Jodie Montplaisir, a mother-of-five from North Hampton, Massachusetts, was struggling with opioid use disorder. She was unhoused, unemployed and separated from her children. Montplaisir said she realized she had hit a low point and needed help. She entered an opioid treatment program (OTP), paid for by Medicaid. "I really just was like, 'I need to fix my life,' and I did," Montplaisir, 38, told ABC News. "I really stuck in with the clinic and doing all of the meetings, all the groups, all my therapy, just really utilizing the clinic … and they really helped me." MORE: Here are the times Trump has said he wouldn't cut Medicaid Montplaisir is now three years into her recovery, currently living in an apartment, reunited with her children and has a job working with unhoused people. Medicaid currently covers her medication-assisted treatment, and she attends clinic weekly to stay accountable. However, she fears any interruption, such as red tape or new requirements, could jeopardize her progress. "If I didn't have Medicaid, I wouldn't have been able to do the clinic," she said. "There's absolutely no way possible. If I didn't have Medicaid and the help of the system, I wouldn't have been able to do it alone." The Republicans'proposed billwould impose work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients -- at least 80 hours per month -- or require enrolling in an educational program for at least 80 hours or some combination per month. Not all Republicans are in favor the bill in its current form. A growing number of House GOP members are expressing grievances, some because they don't believe the bill does enough to protect vulnerable Americans and others because it does not include some of the most drastic cuts that Republican hardliners were pushing for. Montplaisir said if work requirements were in place when she was in OTP, it would have made it impossible for her to focus on her recovery, and it will make it difficult for the unhoused people she now works with. While the draft language has exemptions for certain adults, including those who have substance use disorder, Montplaisir worries proving an exemption could be complex and may result in lost coverage anyway. Additionally, trying to prove work requirements as opposed to focusing on recovery could derail people's progress, she said. "Medicaid is there to help us ... how we supposed to work if we're trying to get sober?" Montplaisir said. "If I had to have paid money while I'm trying to get sober or having to work while I'm trying to get sober, it wouldn't work." ABC News' John Parkinson and Lauren Peller contributed to this report. 'I feel very scared': Some Americans fear losing coverage due to proposed Medicaid cutsoriginally appeared onabcnews.go.com

'I feel very scared': Some Americans fear losing coverage due to proposed Medicaid cuts

'I feel very scared': Some Americans fear losing coverage due to proposed Medicaid cuts Key components of the bill to fund President...
Selling Greek Cypriot property in the breakaway north of split Cyprus? You could end up in courtNew Foto - Selling Greek Cypriot property in the breakaway north of split Cyprus? You could end up in court

NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) —Cypruswon't stop launching legal proceedings against realtors and developers who illegally make money off Greek Cypriot properties in the breakaway north of the ethnically divided island nation, with four such cases currently being adjudicated, an official said Friday. A Ukrainian man, a German national and two Israelis — among them real estate developer Simon Aykut — are being tried on a variety of charges including illegally advertising the sale of Greek Cypriot property, illegal possession and use of such property and conspiracy. All four defendants remain in custody. The properties are in areas along Cyprus' northern and eastern coastlines near the towns of Kyrenia and Famagusta in villages such as Akanthou and Ayios Amvrosios (Tatlisu and Esentepe in Turkish respectively) that are popular with foreign buyers because of their idyllic surroundings. Property rightsare a deeply contentious issue inCyprus, which was split in 1974 when Turkey invaded in the wake of an Athens junta-backed coup aiming at uniting the island with Greece. Some 160,000 Greek Cypriots subsequently fled the north where Turkish Cypriots declared independence that only Turkey recognizes. Around 45,000 Turkish Cypriots living in the south, where the internationally recognized government is seated, moved to the north. Property has been a core issue over decades of failed, United Nationsmediated peace talks. The EU's top court as well as the European Court of Human Rights have affirmed the Greek Cypriots' rights to property ownership in the north. But the ECHR has also backed the establishment of a Turkish Cypriotproperty commissionto which Greek Cypriots can apply to either be compensated for their property or reclaim it. But a recent boom in construction of luxury villas and apartments in the north has prompted Cypriot legal authorities to take a more assertive stance toward realtors and developers to discourage what they say is the large-scale "illegal usurpation" of Greek Cypriot land. "It's not just a few homes being built on Greek Cypriot property, we're now seeing entire complexes being constructed," a lawyer with knowledge of the pending cases told The Associated Press. "And the ongoing legal action has clearly had an effect on foreigners who are now more reluctant to get involved." The lawyer spoke on condition of anonymity because they can't discuss the matter publicly. Last week, a Cypriot court sentenced two Hungarian women to 30 month and 15 month jail sentences respectively for advertising the sale of Greek Cypriot property in the north online. "The exploitation of property that belongs to displaced Cypriots for financial gain is, from any perspective, unacceptable and condemnable," the court said in its decision. The court also suggested that such exploitation could risk harming future peace talks by adversely complicating the property issue. The island's Greek Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides said this week that although the executive branch doesn't interfere in the work of the judiciary, the prosecutions are ultimately a message to all those involved in the sale of Greek Cypriot properties in the north that "what they're doing is an illegal act and are prosecuted for it." "The right to property is an individual matter and the owner of the property is the one who should decide what to do with it, nothing more," he said. But the court cases have sparked a furor among Turkish Cypriot leaders who view it as a hostile attempt to undercut their community's economic development. Turkish Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar called the prosecutions a "terrorist act" against Turkish Cypriots in defiance of international law, aiming to "weaken them legally and politically" on top of harming their economic prospects. He also warned that the court actions "won't go unanswered."

Selling Greek Cypriot property in the breakaway north of split Cyprus? You could end up in court

Selling Greek Cypriot property in the breakaway north of split Cyprus? You could end up in court NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) —Cypruswon't stop ...
Key Moments From Trump's Whirlwind Tour of the Middle EastNew Foto - Key Moments From Trump's Whirlwind Tour of the Middle East

President Donald Trump has wrapped up his three-country tour of the Middle East, during which significant moves were made to transform the United States' relationship with the region. The President solidified investment agreements, conducted the first meeting between U.S. and Syrian Presidents in 25 years, hinted at the potential for a nuclear deal with Iran, and much more. Trump kickstarted his visit on Tuesday, May 13, when he landed in Saudi Arabia's capital, Riyadh, and was greeted by luxury at the Royal Saudi Palace. He signed deals and agreements worth billions of dollars, covering a number of industries. Qatar was Trump's next stop. He landed in the capital city of Doha on Wednesday, May 14. Another flurry of agreements were made—including a$96 billion Boeing deal—followed by a roundtable with business leaders, where Trump resurfaced his idea of a U.S. takeover of the Gaza strip. Trump arrived in the United Arab Emirates on Thursday, May 15, for the final leg of his tour, during which he signed an agreement onAI worth around $1.4 trillion. Read More:From Fighter Jet Escorts to the Gifting of Oil, the Most Memorable Photos of Trump's Middle East TourReflecting on his trip, Trump lamented that future Presidents may well take credit for what he has achieved. "Somebody's going to be taking the credit for this. You remember, press, this guy did it,"Trump told reporters during the flight home on Air Force One. As Trump returns to Washington, D.C., here's a look back at the key moments from his whirlwind tour of the Middle East: Trump's trip started off with a glitzy welcome from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The President was joined by Tesla CEO and Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) lead Elon Musk, as well as other important U.S. business figures including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink. In Riyadh, Trump announced that the U.S. had agreed to sell Saudi Arabia an arms package worth nearly $142 billion. The two leaders also signedagreements on security and intelligence cooperation, technology, and energy. The White House has said that Saudi investments signed during Trump's visit are worth a total of $600 billion. In an unexpected announcement during a U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum on Tuesday, May 13,Trump said he plans to lift U.S. sanctions on Syria, some of which have been in place for over 45 years. Trump called the sanctions "brutal and crippling," but noted their necessity before the collapse of theBashar Assadregime in December 2024. Trump said that now, in this new era, it's time for Syria to "shine." Many experts, including Benjamin Feve, a senior research analyst at Karam Shaar Advisory, have said that Trump's plan to list the sanctions may not be straightforward. "He [Trump] cannot just declare it, you have to go through a specific process which involves barriers in the Administration. You have the Secretary of State, the Treasury, Congress," Feve tells TIME. "They have to be re-thought, redesigned in order to continue who they will be imposed upon." The collapse of the Assad regime in December occurred when Ahmed al-Sharaa's group Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) led a rebel coalition. Assad fled Syria with his family and sought asylum in Russia. HTS has beendesignated a terrorist organizationby the United States, and al-Sharaa had a$10 million reward for his arrest placed on him by the U.S. government, before it was lifted in December. On Wednesday, May 14,Trump and al-Sharaa met in Riyadh. They were accompanied by the Saudi Crown Prince, while Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan joined remotely via telephone. Talking to reporters afterwards on Air Force One, Trump described the Syrian leader, a former militant, as a "young, attractive guy. Tough guy. Strong past. Very strong past. Fighter… He's got a real shot at holding it together." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later revealedthat Trump had urged al-Sharaa to normalise ties with Israel, clamp down on terrorism in Syria, and work with the U.S. to stop any resurgence of ISIS. Read More:Trump Meets With Syria's President After Announcing Plans to Lift U.S. Sanctions on Country Trump's plan to accept a luxury Boeing from Qatar had caused controversy before the President left for his tour of the Gulf. Valued at roughly $400 million, the gifted plane—and the potential of Trump going through with accepting it—has raised ethical, legal, and security concerns."He's going to turn Air Force One into Bribe Force One," Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusettstold TIME. "Congress has to be involved with such a clear threat to our national security." Republicans, such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, also raised concerns. Read More:Trump Doubles Down on Plan to Receive Qatar's Plane Gift: 'Only a Fool Would Not Accept This' But the President has doubled down on his intentions to accept the plane, which he says will be used as a temporary Air Force One while two more jets are still in production to replace current models. In a May 14 post on his social media platform, TruthSocial, Trump said: "The Boeing 747 is being given to the United States Air Force/Department of Defense, NOT TO ME! It is a gift from a Nation, Qatar, that we have successfully defended for many years… "Only a FOOL would not accept this gift on behalf of our country." He also defended his stance during an interview withFox News' Sean Hannity on Air Force One. Qatar's Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani gave his take on the gift controversyduring an interviewwith CNN. "It's still under legal review. I don't know why it became so big as news… We have done a lot together with the U.S.," he said, adding that it was just a case of "very simple government-to-government dealing." When asked whether this was an instance of "buying influence" with the U.S., the Qatari leader said: "Why would we buy influence in the United States? If you look at the last 10 years of the U.S.-Qatar relationship, Qatar has always been there for the U.S. when it's needed... We believe this friendship needs to be mutually-beneficial for both countries. It cannot be a one-way relationship." A notable absence from Trump's list of stops during his Middle East tour was Israel, but the ongoing Israel-Hamas war has still been a central point of discussion for the President. Trump expressed hope for the"safety and dignity" for Palestinians in Gazaduring a Gulf Cooperation Council Summit in Riyadh on Wednesday. The next morning, at a roundtable discussion with business leaders in Doha, Trump once againraised his idea for a U.S. takeover of Gaza. It's an idea that has been previouslycondemnedby many world leaders, as it would likely involve the displacement of the entire Palestinian population. "I think I'd be proud to have the United States have it, take it, make it a freedom zone," Trump said. "They've never solved the Gaza problem and if you look at it, I have aerial shots, I mean there's practically no building standing, there's no building. People are living under the rubble of buildings that collapsed, which is not acceptable, it's tremendous death. And I want to see that be a freedom zone." Trump's remarks came amid another series of airstrikes on Gaza. Israel has previously announced plans toexpand military occupation over the entire Gaza Strip indefinitely. Read More:Trump Suggests U.S. Should 'Take' Gaza and Turn It Into a 'Freedom Zone' The President's trip to the Gulf also involved discussions on Iran and the potential progress of a deal with the country. In his first term, Trumpwithdrewfrom the nuclear deal the Obama Administration had secured with Iran after years of negotiations. "I want to make a deal,"Trump said Wednesday during the GCC Summit. He stipulated that a deal would be dependent on Iranhalting its support for terrorism and fueling proxy warsin the region, as well as the countrynot having nuclear weapons. In an interview with NBC on Wednesday, Ali Shamkhani—a key political, military and nuclear adviser to the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei—said that the country is ready to sign a nuclear deal with the U.S., subject to conditions. Shamkhani said that if a deal were to take place, Iran would not make nuclear weapons, would reduce stockpiles of enriched uranium to a level only needed for civilian use, and would allow international inspectors to supervise the process. In return, all economic sanctions on Iran would need to be lifted. Shamkhani said that if those conditions were met, Iran would sign an agreement on the day. During Thursday's roundtable in Doha, Trump said that talks between Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, and Abbas Araghchi, Iran's Foreign Affairs Minister, were progressing as "very serious negotiations." However,Araghchi later said thatenriching uranium was a core right for Iran and it was a red line regarding negotiations. On Friday, after departing the UAE, his final stop of the tour, Trump said that Iran had received a proposal from the U.S. regarding the nuclear programme. Talking to reporters on Air Force One,he said: "They have a proposal, but more importantly, they know that they have to move quickly, or something bad, something bad's gonna happen." Contact usatletters@time.com.

Key Moments From Trump's Whirlwind Tour of the Middle East

Key Moments From Trump's Whirlwind Tour of the Middle East President Donald Trump has wrapped up his three-country tour of the Middle Ea...
Trump returns to Washington with investment agreements but no major peace dealsNew Foto - Trump returns to Washington with investment agreements but no major peace deals

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — President Donald Trump is returning to Washington on Friday after a diplomatic tour of the Middle East, where he pitched American business and secured investment pledges but failed to reach long-promised peace deals in Gaza and Ukraine. Marked by high-level talks and lavish displays of regional hospitality, the trip showcased Trump's self-styled role as a dealmaker and peacemaker. Still, his loftiest targets — resolving the conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine — remain elusive. In Abu Dhabi, Trump capped his weeklong tour with a visit to Qasr Al Watan, the emirate's presidential palace, where he toured exhibits showcasing investments in energy, health care and aviation. Accompanied by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the president met with business leaders andtook shots at his predecessor. "I'm just thinking, we have a president of the United States doing the selling," Trump said, taking a swipe at former President Joe Biden. "You think Biden would be doing this? I don't think so." A large screen at the event repurposed his campaign slogan to proclaim "Making Energy Great Again," a nod to the economic focus of the trip. Throughout the week, Trump announced major investments by Middle Eastern nations in American businesses,including a $600 billion investment deal from Saudi Arabiaand an agreement with Qatar Airwaysto buy hundreds of planesfrom Boeing and GE Aerospace. White House spokesman Harrison Fields lauded the trip as an "incredibly formative visit that forged America's Golden Age through its partnerships with a critical region of the world." The visit came amid controversy over Trump's eagerness to accept a planned gift from the Qatari government:a $400 million luxury planewhich he hopes to use as Air Force One. The offer has drawn backlash fromDemocratsand someRepublicansback home over potential ethical, security andfinancialchallenges. Trump repeatedly dismissed concerns about the plane, saying he "thought it was a great gesture."He also brushed off accusationsthat the trip, which came as his namesake company expands into the Middle East, created a potential conflict of interest. Yet, even as he celebrated his economic victories, the president faced the reality upon departure of the ongoing wars in Gaza and Ukraine, conflicts he has vowed to resolve. The president has made ending some of the world'sthorniestconflicts a top priority of his administration, vowing to stop the bloodshed and bring about a lasting peace. And in a show of strong commitment, he has dispatched top aides to the cause, with special envoy Steve Witkoff hopscotching the globe in pursuit of the president's goal. Before departing Washington, Trump announced the release of Edan Alexander, an American held by Hamas, with Qatar playing a central role in the negotiations. However, the president acknowledged that significant challenges remain. "We're looking at Gaza," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he left Abu Dhabi. "And we're going to get that taken care of. A lot of people are starving." As Trump concluded his trip Friday,Israeli airstrikes had killedmore than 100 people in the last 24 hours, according to local health authorities. On Friday, asked about future opportunities for face-to-face diplomacy between himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump responded: "We have to meet. He and I will meet. I think we'll solve it, or maybe not." Earlier, Trump had expressed disappointment but not surprise when Putin failed to attend a planned meeting in Turkey. "I didn't think it was possible for him to go if I didn't go," Trump said, noting that his schedule had made the trip untenable. Instead, he teased the near possibility of a breakthrough in nuclear talks with Iran. Trump told reporters Friday that his administration had submitted a proposal for a deal with Tehran, after describing earlier their efforts "in very serious negotiations with Iran for long-term peace." Earlier in the week, Trump hinted that he hoped an agreement was near, stating that "we're not going to be making any nuclear dust in Iran." Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said later Friday that his government had not "received any written proposal from the United States" and that there was "no scenario" in which Tehran would abandon its nuclear program to reach a deal with the U.S. "Iran nonetheless remains determined and straightforward: Respect our rights and terminate your sanctions, and we have a deal," he said on X. "Mark my words: there is no scenario in which Iran abandons its hard-earned right to enrichment for peaceful purposes: a right afforded to all other [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty] signatories, too." Trump also said Friday that recognizing the new Syrian government —and lifting what he called"brutal" and "biting" sanctions — was "the right thing to do" as the new leadership cements its control. Trump said Wednesday that the trip did not sideline Benjamin Netanyahuby forgoing a visitwith the Israeli prime minister, explaining that his relationships with Arab leaders are "very good for Israel." He also said he reached out to Netanyahu on the decision to lift sanctions on Syria. Analysts see parallels between this trip and Trump's 2017 Middle East tour. "The key thing to watch is what comes next in the region and what big steps his administration takes," said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. After 2017, the Gulf region saw a rift that isolated Qatar for three years and a U.S. "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran that he said failed to deliver lasting results. Yet, the trip also laid the groundwork for the Abraham Accords, the 2020 agreement normalizing ties between Israel and several Arab states, which remains Trump's signature foreign policy achievement and which Biden sought to continue. Trump is aiming higher. "This time around, Trump is looking for a historic breakthrough with Iran on the nuclear talks and also dreams of getting a Nobel Prize if he gets that Iran deal or expands the Abraham Accords to include a Saudi-Israeli normalization accord," Katulis said. Trump's hosts this week have also played important roles in these efforts, helping to mediate the conflicts and offering support to negotiations, and the president acknowledged there was more to do as he departed Abu Dhabi. "Unexpected surprises and events have a way of knocking U.S. administrations off balance," Katulis said. "The ongoing war in Gaza and the growing misery of Palestinians living there will be a critical test."

Trump returns to Washington with investment agreements but no major peace deals

Trump returns to Washington with investment agreements but no major peace deals ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — President Donald Trump is ...
Why Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' May Be in TroubleNew Foto - Why Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' May Be in Trouble

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, was one of five Republicans on the House Budget Committee to vote against the reconciliation bill in the Cannon House Office Building on May 16, 2025. Credit - Bill Clark—CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Asweeping bill that's at the center of Republicans' efforts to deliver on President Donald Trump's second-term agenda hit a major roadblock on Friday. Trump was not happy. "We don't need 'GRANDSTANDERS' in the Republican Party," the Presidentpostedon Truth Social minutes before a handful of GOP hardliners voted against his "big, beautiful bill" at a key House Budget Committee meeting, effectively stalling the legislation from advancing. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and increase spending on the military and border security, offset in part by cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and subsidies for clean energy. House Speaker Mike Johnson has struggled to craft a bill that slashes enough spending to satisfy right-wing members of his party without losing support from GOP moderates, who are wary of cutting too much from widely used safety-net programs. Republican leaders had been hoping to push the bill through the House before a Memorial Day recess, though that timeline appears less probable after Friday's failed vote in the Budget Committee—one of the final stops before it can reach the House floor. Five Republican fiscal hawks on the committee joined with all Democrats in voting against the bill, with the GOP holdouts expressing concerns that the bill doesn't cut Medicaid spending enough and takes too long phasing out the clean energy tax credits passed as part of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. They argued that the way the bill front-loads tax cuts in the next few years but delays spending cuts until later is fiscally reckless. "This bill falls profoundly short. It does not do what we say it does with respect to deficits," Texas Rep. Chip Roy, one of those holdouts, said during the markup. South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, another one of the holdouts, said he was "very disappointed" with the bill:  "Sadly, I'm a hard no until we get this ironed out." Top GOP lawmakers are expected to continue private talks with the White House and reluctant Republicans over the weekend to figure out a path forward on Trump's signature legislation. They are using a process known as budget reconciliation to allow Republicans to push the measure through the Senate with a simple majority, rather than the two-thirds support they would need to avoid a filibuster. Assuming Democrats remain united against the bill, Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes in either the House or the Senate. Here are the main sticking points for Republicans on Trump's "big, beautiful bill." For months, Democrats have condemned the bill's health care provisions as a disaster for the country. More than eight million Americans are expected to lose insurance coverage if the bill becomes law—an outcome some Republicans fear will kill their chances in the 2026 midterms. But that isn't stopping some fiscal conservatives from wanting even more cuts. A key part of the measure is nearly $800 billion in reduced spending for Medicaid, a program that provides health coverage for low- and middle-income households. Republicans are hoping to include new work requirements for adult Medicaid beneficiaries without children that would take effect starting in 2029. Under the proposed plan, adult Medicaid recipients would need to submit paperwork every month showing they worked at least 80 hours or qualified for an exception. Democrats, and some swing-vote Republicans, have warned that millions of Americans will lose health care coverage if the provision goes into effect. Indeed, an estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Medicaid changes would reduce the number of people with health care by at least 7.6 million. But proponents say that the new work requirements areestimatedto save $300 billion over a decade, while also creating incentives for work. "We don't want people to be on this program for forever," Rep. Cliff Bentz, an Oregon Republican,saidduring the Energy and Commerce Committee budget reconciliation markup on Wednesday. "And this is a really good way to get off it and get a job." Roy and some of the other Republicans who voted against the measure said they wanted work requirements to start earlier than 2029, which falls after Trump's term. "We do need to reform it. We need to stop giving seven times as much money to the able bodied over the vulnerable," Roy said during the Budget Committee vote on Friday. "But guess what? That message needs to be delivered to my colleagues on this side of the aisle too. We are writing checks we cannot cash, and our children are going to pay the price. So I am a no on this bill unless serious reforms are made today, tomorrow, Sunday. We're having conversations as we speak, but something needs to change, or you're not going to get my support." The Republican holdouts also want to more quickly scrap Biden's clean-energy tax credits, which the current bill phases out over several years. Rep. Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma, one of the Republican holdouts who blocked the legislation, said he was particularly concerned about allowing wind and solar tax credits to continue. "As it is currently written, Green New Scam subsidy phaseouts are delayed until 2029—with some of these subsidies lasting until 2041," he said in a statement, adding that he also wants the Medicaid work requirements to go into effect immediately rather than in 2029. But not all Republicans support the cuts.More than three-quartersof the investments out of the Inflation Reduction Act have occurred in red districts. And many of the clean energy incentives were expected to last a decade after it was passed, prompting some businesses to invest heavily in the sector. Twenty one House Republicans wrote aletterto the House Ways and Means Committee in March urging against cuts to energy credits from the Inflation Reduction Act, writing that "countless American companies are utilizing sector-wide energy tax credits." Trump has acted aggressively to halt payments under the bill. On his first day back in office, he issued an executive order that required all federal agencies to immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act—which a federal judge later ruled against. Under the bill, there would be new restrictions on tax breaks for power plants and factories that build solar panels and other technologies using components from China. It would also largely phase out a $7,500 tax break for buyers of electric cars. At the same time, Republican leaders are negotiating with GOP lawmakers from high-tax states like New York who are demanding a higher cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction for their constituents. The bill, in its current form, includes a provision that would raise the cap from $10,000 to $30,000 for those with a modified adjusted gross income of $400,000 or less, though some Republicans believe that limit is too low for their high-tax, high-income districts. Four New York Republicans—Mike Lawler, Elise Stefanik, Andrew Garbarino, and Nick Lalota—wrotea joint statementlast week rejecting the $30,000 SALT cap offer. "It's not just insulting—it risks derailing President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill," they said, arguing that "New Yorkers already send far more to Washington than we get back, unlike many so-called 'low-tax' states that depend heavily on federal largesse." However, not all Republicans favor raising the SALT cap. Fiscal conservatives argue that Congress should not be subsidizing high-tax states at the expense of others. Write toNik Popli atnik.popli@time.com.

Why Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' May Be in Trouble

Why Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' May Be in Trouble Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, was one of five Republicans on the House Budget Comm...

 

MON SEVEN © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com